Crossover Results
hjohn74
Posts: 101
Not too bad, I'm shocked by the ACG Cross.
St. Mountain NGC 65 to PCGS 65
Lexington NGC 65 to PCGS 65
York NGC 66 to PCGS 65
Sesqui ACG 63 to PCGS 63
I'm very disappointed in the downgrade of the York. It's a very sharp coin. Does PCGS have a regrade service?
St. Mountain NGC 65 to PCGS 65
Lexington NGC 65 to PCGS 65
York NGC 66 to PCGS 65
Sesqui ACG 63 to PCGS 63
I'm very disappointed in the downgrade of the York. It's a very sharp coin. Does PCGS have a regrade service?
heath
0
Comments
The Accucrap crossover is SHOCKING
Cheers,
Bob
William S. Burroughs, Cities of the Red Night
Another reason why the value goes up at the same grade in a PCGS slab, versus another service's slab, is a registry issue: NGC allows PCGS coins in its registry, PCGS does not allow NGC coins in its registry. Therefore an NGC coin has "no value" for PCGS registry purposes, but you can always use a PCGS coin in NGC's registry.
The "spread" is a controversial issue, so don't be surprised if others weigh in on this question with differing views. Great to have you on the boards!
William S. Burroughs, Cities of the Red Night
WoW !!!
Endo
3 out of 4!
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
-Laura Swenson
In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
<< <i>If they are still the same coins, why are they worth more? >>
I understand your point, au58. It reminds me of a saying I read years ago about computers:
If you put garbage into a computer, nothing comes out but garbage. But this garbage, having passed through a very expensive machine, is somehow ennobled, and no one dares to criticize it.
Not saying these coins are garbage, nor that the slabbing outfits are, but the idea is similar.
New collectors, please educate yourself before spending money on coins; there are people who believe that using numismatic knowledge to rip the naïve is what this hobby is all about.
I bet Heath would like to think his success, even with the ACG coin, is attributable to his keen ability to accurately assess a coin's quality and grade. It also is attributable to his openmindedness. Something about which you, and many others on this Board, have NO understanding!
He is smart enough to overlook a coin's holder and assess the coin's strength based upon that coin's merits. The close minded individual would have gone right past that coin for no other reason than it was in an ACG holder.
Here's to Heath! You did some great cross-over work there! I'm interested, as are others, whether you sent the coins in their respective holders for a cross-over grade or did you crack the coins out of their holders and then send them to PCGS? Congratulations!!!
If a member of this board was offered a coin in a PCGS 65 holder, and was told that it came from a NGC 65 holder, how would the value be determined?
Is a coin that is eligible for registry worth more just to the owner or does everyone think it's worth more?
I bought the coins not the slabs; however, I prefer the PCGS slab. The white background IMO detracts from the coin. Call me crazy, but it's what I like.
I will take both to the Baltimore show next month to get a verbal reason from some of the experts.
You did some great work there! A nice lesson here for the newbies. Learn to grade a particular series, perhaps 2, and you can acquire some really nice coins for cheap money.
Heath, I wish you good luck in getting that York in a PCGS 66 holder. If you are convinced of the coin's grade, give it another run.