5 to 10 seconds to grade a coin?
LucyBop
Posts: 14,001 ✭✭✭
Hmmmmm..... Send in a Franklin and hope for a FBL in 5 to 10 seconds? Maybe 2 1/2 seconds on the obverse and then another 2 1/2 to 5 seconds to determine if its Full Bell? geez, and to think that I study these trying to learn everything I can about the bell lines and areas of the coin that determines if its a well struck coin. Pick up any of your raw coins and count to ten as you are looking at it, can you really grade it this fast? I know that PCGs has professional graders but.........
Be Bop A Lula!!
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
0
Comments
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
These guys look at hundreds of coins weekly (if not thousands). If they can't spot a hairline or a speck within ten seconds they would be in the wrong business.
peacockcoins
CoinPeople.com || CoinWiki.com || NumisLinks.com
<< <i>PR69CDAM or PR70DCAM? I can do that in under 10 seconds easy. I just timed myself and it only took me 4 seconds to flip a coin. It came up tails, PR69DCAM it is. >>
Of course after flipping it, it is now a PR66CAM.
peacockcoins
Dan
mcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu">dmcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
Seriously, look at your watch. Check as ten seconds go by. It really is a fair amount of time for the typical coin.
I can't do it, but come see any of us after we've graded thousands of coins, eight hour shifts...
peacockcoins
<< <i> Of course after flipping it, it is now a PR66CAM. >>
No way! I wear gloves when I flip... errr... I mean... grade them!
In all seriousness. 10 seconds is probably an average and seems like a realistic average to me. Some coins might take a little longer (as in 20 seconds and I am sure an even smaller amount require a little consultation or something else) but if you job is to grade coins and you do it hour after hour, day after day with thousands of coins, 10 seconds should be a pretty realistic timeframe. From the way I have always thought of it...It is factory work/assembly line type work and speed comes with repetition.
CoinPeople.com || CoinWiki.com || NumisLinks.com
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
Lucy, please realize also that this is not only PCGS that grades in this manner (as far as I know!). I think the other major grading services probably grade MS63-65 Morgans in 5-10 seconds as well, with other coins obviously taking more time because of attribution, or if they are coins they don't see as often. Also, remember that 3 graders view the coin, so if they all look for say 10 seconds and say '64', '64', '64', it is probably a 64, and staring at the coin for a while probably won't change that! I do agree that it seems like coins with FBL, Full Steps, etc to check would take longer.
JJacks
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
I can grade that coin in 4.2 seconds!!!!
Seriously, those guys have graded so many coins they are like machines. They don't even have to think about it. It's just second nature.
I am at 5 seconds with you. Professional graders look at hundeds of coins each day. We all would
be that good if we did. Many large dealers are as well. This is common sense. Any profession is
the same, whether you are a brain surgeon or putting together widgets. Human beings adapt to
repetitive stimuli.
Brian.
TRUTH
<< <i>I am at 5 seconds with you. Professional graders look at hundeds of coins each day. We all would be that good if we did. Many large dealers are as well. This is common sense. Any profession is the same, whether you are a brain surgeon or putting together widgets. Human beings adapt to
repetitive stimuli. >>
Well, maybe the Hepkitty doesn't have 'common sense' but when I think about this I get dizzy baby......Lets see at 5seconds a pop, thats 12 coins a minute which turns into 720 an hour which then in a 8 hour shift turns into 5760 and figure a five day week and you get 28,800 and in a month.........Oh shoot, where is my margarita, it needs more tequila!!!! I hope those cats are listening to Doo Wop and 1950s Rockabilly while they are grading!
_____________________________
Lucille's Rockin' Radio
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
you reach that figure, you will be able to grade a coin in 5 seconds. Most graders don't even use a
glass. Remeber that the big three use two graders minimum and a finalizer. Magnification is used
rarely, and mostly for die varieties and authentication purposes. This is a fact.
Brian.
what you say is probably true. Now, would you BUY a $1000 coin without using a magnifying glass. If graders DO NOT use magnifying glasses, it just adds to the credibility problems with grading services as a whole. Collectors must be able to use tools correctly, why not the grading services?
TRUTH
Brian.
I meant 'unholdered' coin. Anyone can buy a $1000 sight unseen IN a holder.
TRUTH
I'm with you.
IrishMike
I also agree that the time factor may definitely be why those who complaining about a variety of grading problems, and the lack of consistency in grading, are experiencing those particular problems. You guys aren't the same defending this 5 - 10 second grading issue, are you?
Personally, I think it leads to complacency.
JJacks
I don't think anyone is implying they should be "staring" at the coins. You only focus on one spot by staring, and that goes out of focus after a while.
The best graders out there don't use magnification when grading coins. When I've gone to shows to buy and sell coins I rarely use a glass. I've done whole shows without using it once.
This brings up a point I've always wanted to make. When grading a coin you shouldn't have to use anything stronger than a 5x glass. Everything you need to see can be seen. To look for varieties or authenticity a stronger magnification is neccessary. I think when you use something stronger than a 5X glass it tends to make one focus on minor flaws and lose the overall grade of the coin.
Would be interesting if a member who is out at Fall Long Beach does a little survey for a few minutes ing some of the top graders/buyers who are viewing coins and present that after the show.
roadrunner
_____________________
the HepKitty
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
This is an astonishingly quick amount of time. To me, it indicates that PCGS may not have internalized how significant its activities are to the collector community, and that PCGS is currently understaffed. I think the grading time may very well be a function of having to keep up with heavy volume (while keeping down personnel costs) more than extraordinarily swift and precise grading abilities.
It also emphasizes that "first impressions count." Eye appeal and "gestalt" evidently play more of a role in PCGS grading than I thought previously.
William S. Burroughs, Cities of the Red Night
A few replies here:
1. Please don't compare a dealer grading for possible purchase to PCGS grading. The dealer is certainly thinking about How much they need the coin, if they like the look of the coin in their inventory, etc. A PCGS grader looks at the coin, assigns a grade and knows they have the backing that at least 2 others will look at it. If they make an obvious mistake, it won't go out as such unless the others all make the same mistake! I really doubt it is common that the three grades given (for a Morgan for example) are '65', '62', '67' very often! They are usally right on in agreement with each other or off by 1 point, and then the finalizer decides on the final number
2. PCGS I don't beleive is the only grading company that does it with this speed. I bet NGC uses about the same amount of time, so I don't think it is fair to criticize PCGS only. Maybe we need to get info from NGC about the amount of time they spend.
3. Ok, fine forget Staring - Looking at the coin for longer usually won't change the grade!
4. If PCGS started taking 30 seconds on common Morgan $s, submission times could go through the roof, and people would complain.
5. If PCGS started taking 30 seconds on common Morgan $s, and hired more graders so that they could still be quick, submission prices could go through the roof, and people would complain. Also, they may have to higher less skilled graders then.
6. Remember that you are always free to resubmit coins if you feel there was an error. Yes, it does cost money, but if you really beleive they were wrong, you do have that option. I think PCGS is a bit on the conservative side so that the Franklins they grade MS65, like Lucy says are nicer then the 64 counterparts. I also have a few 65s, with a bunch of 64s, and the 65s are the nicest of them all.
7. Other low ball grading companies for all I know may spend 5 minutes grading coins (they probably could use the study!), and they still overgrade 95% of what they are sent. There appears to be no correlation between taking alot of time to grade a coin and getting it right.
JJacks
In a recent month, PCGS certified 130,000 coins. Another month was close to 100,000. Let's use the 100K figure as a ballpark average.
Number of working days in the usual month is 22. That means 4,545 coins through per day.
Each coin goes through 3 graders and a finalizer. This means 4 grades per coin or 18,180 individual gradings per day.
Let's assume that a productive day is 7 hours long for a grader (bathroom breaks, staff meetings, etc - probably generous). That means 2,597 gradings per hour.
There are 6 PCGS graders per Rick Montgomery's Q&A answer. That means 432 gradings per hour per grader.
432 gradings / 3,600 seconds per hour = 8.3 seconds per coin per grader.
Wow. Think about that. This includes time to get it from the tray, grade it, put it back, and type the rating in the computer. No more than 5 seconds spent on the coin itself. And this goes on continously - all day, every day.
I know some of you think this would be a dream job. To me, it would be a monotonous nightmare.
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
roadrunner
swissmiss45
swissmiss45
I agree that looking at a coin longer doesn't change the grade, and for that matter, not looking at it at all isn't going to change the grade, but, a careful study/look/examination (however you want to describe this process) CAN make you reconsider your first impression, and to my mind, in 5 to 10 seconds, that is about all you are really going to get.
I am not paying for an impression OR rather, if an impression is the extent of what I am supposed to expect for my money, then that is how it should be advertised.
I guess as long as one can fall back on assigning grades based on its marketability and the subjectivity of "eye appeal," which I don't really believe is GENERALLY so far apart amongst like-minded persons, the debate is essentially moot.
As long as people continue to receive coins with debris (however minor) in the slab, scratched up BRAND NEW slabs, typographically incorrect labels, and the other little missteps that come with lack of attention to detail, why would anybody accept the 5 - 10 second argument - particularly when so many as unsatisfied with the grade(s) they get for their expenditure. The graders on the payroll are NOT the only competent graders in the world.
Surely, at some time during your career, you have been REQUIRED cut a corner or to to meet a deadline, quota, maybe some overall goal beyond your control. It happens everywhere else, why not PCGS?