PCGS: Is my MS Ike treated differently than Tradedollarnut's 1885 Proof?
braddick
Posts: 23,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
And... if the answer ends up being "Yes, it most certainly is..." I'm OK with that:
Is a somewhat common "collector's coin", whether that be a 1932-P Washington in AU50, or a Clad Ike dollar in MS64 treated differently than a super rare early Proof?
Is value of the coin a consideration in handling? In processing? In GRADING?
Customer service- second to none- regardless of the coins submitted?
What's been your experience?
Is a somewhat common "collector's coin", whether that be a 1932-P Washington in AU50, or a Clad Ike dollar in MS64 treated differently than a super rare early Proof?
Is value of the coin a consideration in handling? In processing? In GRADING?
Customer service- second to none- regardless of the coins submitted?
What's been your experience?
peacockcoins
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
Tom
<< <i>Isn't there an 1804 Dollar in a PCGS holder with a great big fingerprint on it? I have heard they hired someone specifically to grade moderns, but other than that I am unsure what they would do different. >>
I think the problem(s) with the 1804 dollar lay with the XF40 turning into an eventual AU58 and isn't there one that has a counterstamp (albeit, a very tiny one) on its obverse that is holdered?
It's the "MS69" Indian Cent that has the fingerprint.
peacockcoins
That would be rough!!!!
My Barbers