Home U.S. Coin Forum

1842 half dime strike? *worthless scans added*

Were these coins known for having a partiularly weak or strong strike? I have one that has VF30-EF40+ details but appears to have AU luster, especially on the obverse. I'm curious if the level of detail is due to a common weak strike or if this date is generally well struck. This coin seems weaker on the reverse, in the wreath. I'll post images if I can make a decent scan. Thanks for any response.

BC
Dip Happens...image

Comments

  • hi!

    most of the one's in my collection have weak strikes. I will say there are some dates that have very sharp strikes also.

    the book the complete guide to liberty seated half dimes.

    buy AL BLYTHE is the book to buy.

    may the force be with you.



    rob.
  • Thanks Rob. What's the price for the Blythe book? Is it book still in print?

    Here are scans of the coin, but they're not my best work, and my work isn't the best to begin with.image They show none of the luster, dull-out the bright sea-green shades in the toning, and generally look like crap.image But they're the best I've got, so...

    Obverse
    Reverse

    BC
    Dip Happens...image
  • Anyone else want to chime in?image
    Dip Happens...image
  • toyonakatarotoyonakataro Posts: 407 ✭✭✭
    Hi
    According to the book "the complete guide to liberty seated half dimes", 1842 comes well struck with nice luster in general.
    You can get the book at Stanton, but if you want to get one cheaper, you should search eBay. I was told by several members that the book is not up-to-date, but still a good book.
    Your half dime looks EF45 to me, but I'm not an expert. I like it anywayimage
  • BigD5BigD5 Posts: 3,433
    That coin has quite a bit more detail than vf/30!! It looks au+ to me from the scan. All the details seem sharp, with rub at the high points only (breast and right leg). Nice coin.
    BigD5
    LSCC#1864

    Ebay Stuff
  • Thanks to all who've responded. I too, like the coin--very much. It's probably in my top three favorites in my humble type collection.

    I thought the obverse had EF40+ details but the reverse seems flat (essentially no ribs on leaves, etc.) compared to other dates I've looked at with equivalent obverses. That is what seemed odd. Perhaps I should have made that more clear.

    Maybe a better question would be: Is this level of reverse detail the norm for EF+ stars half dimes or is this coin a little weak in that area? And how much, if any, should that effect the assigned grade?

    BC
    Dip Happens...image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file