I could not resist ... whaddaya think? UPDATED
RGL
Posts: 3,784 ✭
Well, I'm sitting here with some money burning a hole in my pocket (and I'm sure as @#%^&**+@! not going to put it in the market at the moment) and I could not resist the following BIN at $30 per coin. An added $15 each for grading and I do not see much, if any, down side. But, this would have brought in one darn nice Jeff proof I could use. Oh well ... As a plus, I never have been less than 110 percent pleased with any of the coins I have bought from Jeff. He has a great eye ... All opinions, including critical, welcomed:
1954-63 Proof Franklins
Update: Among Jeff's other faults, he is quick. The coins arrived today and I am pleased. As he described, the 54 should CAM (likely as a 65, a few hairlines keep it from higher); the 55 is exceptionally clean (66?) and a no-doubt CAM to my eye. Unmentioned in Jeff's description, the 56 is a beauty that could well CAM; and the 61 he mentioned as a near DCAM sure appears DCAM to me, as high as 66/67. As a bonus, the 62 has the heaviest obverse DCAM ... and then hardly a trace on the reverse. Makes you long for the days of ANACS' split obverse/reverse grading!
The other coins likely are about 66s with varying degrees of CAM contrast, but not likely to win the designation from PCGS. I need to study them further, but 9 of the 10 appear submission-worthy. The '59 has amazing luster, but a big milkspot smack in the middle of Ben's head and other more subtle milk spot flyspecking. And, perhaps the Franklin proof experts can advise if I am learning a few lessons, but the portion of the collar beneath the date can be make/break on CAM designations? Overall, a darn good buy, with the likelihood that a couple of decently graded coins will cover the cost of the entire lot. Will ship them out to Newport Beach soon and let you know how they come back. Thanks for your time!
(P.S. Unexpected bonus: My better half is tickled to see something besides nickels arrive!)
1954-63 Proof Franklins
Update: Among Jeff's other faults, he is quick. The coins arrived today and I am pleased. As he described, the 54 should CAM (likely as a 65, a few hairlines keep it from higher); the 55 is exceptionally clean (66?) and a no-doubt CAM to my eye. Unmentioned in Jeff's description, the 56 is a beauty that could well CAM; and the 61 he mentioned as a near DCAM sure appears DCAM to me, as high as 66/67. As a bonus, the 62 has the heaviest obverse DCAM ... and then hardly a trace on the reverse. Makes you long for the days of ANACS' split obverse/reverse grading!
The other coins likely are about 66s with varying degrees of CAM contrast, but not likely to win the designation from PCGS. I need to study them further, but 9 of the 10 appear submission-worthy. The '59 has amazing luster, but a big milkspot smack in the middle of Ben's head and other more subtle milk spot flyspecking. And, perhaps the Franklin proof experts can advise if I am learning a few lessons, but the portion of the collar beneath the date can be make/break on CAM designations? Overall, a darn good buy, with the likelihood that a couple of decently graded coins will cover the cost of the entire lot. Will ship them out to Newport Beach soon and let you know how they come back. Thanks for your time!
(P.S. Unexpected bonus: My better half is tickled to see something besides nickels arrive!)
0
Comments
I also bought my 1971 PR68DCAM from him, and I've never seen a better one in all the coins I've checked.
Russ, NCNE
Russ, you are right. Jeff is top shelf all the way. I have asked him about a few Jeff proofs he had that looked darn nice as CAMS and he outright tells you they won't make CAM at PCGS, but would at NGC. He's a good seller ... you hang onto them...
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
They look like nice coins
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
And I agree heartily, Jeff Werlin is aces.
Congrats!
William S. Burroughs, Cities of the Red Night
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
Compare those to this 1956 PCGS PR67 DCAM in my swapping stock, then consider the fact that that one certified coin cost me more than 2/3 of what that whole set of raw coins cost you. I got a little more frost, maybe, but not much. And there's one tiny bit of haze on my coin, though most of the stuff you see in that lousy picture is in on the plastic, not the coin.
I'd say you did pretty well. I can think of few things that are as stunning on a coin as CAM or DCAM contrast. Only pretty, pastel-colored, evenly-distributed target toning would come close, in my book.
CAM and DCAM contrast is even purtier on a Barber half...
(And a Seated half, but I haven't gotten that far yet!)