Home› PCGS Set Registry Forum

Reality check - comparison to an EBL III set

WingsruleWingsrule Posts: 3,020 ✭✭✭✭
in PCGS Set Registry Forum
I was just thinking...

EBL III holds first place in the proof Franklin series, with 100% DCAMs and only one possible coin he can upgrade, based on coins currently known.

I've got second place set, also with 100% DCAM (but I got mine first!!), but...check this out...I could use EIGHT of the coins in his set!

Easily looking at six figures plus without breaking a sweat.

Guess number two isn't that bad after all...

Mark

Comments

  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,424 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well hows this. The Jousha Mercury Dime set contains so many single coins that have a greater value than my whole set that it makes me sick. Not really but it does put me into a total awe state.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    He also holds #1 in proof Kennedys, with NO possible coins to upgrade. Matter of fact, unless he sells, nobody can even tie him since he has two pop 1/0 coins.

    Russ, NCNE
    eBay consignment sales | | Collectibles from Resco CCC
  • goyankeezgoyankeez Posts: 357
    What I wouldn't give for a 100% DCAM Franklin set. I wouldn't care what place in the registry I'm in.
    "Buy the coin, not the holder"

    Proof Dime Registry Set
  • goyankeezgoyankeez Posts: 357
    He's also has the #1 Proof Dime Set, missing 2 DCAMs- 1952, 1953.

    image
    "Buy the coin, not the holder"

    Proof Dime Registry Set
  • PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 5,966 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It seem that no matter where you look on the registry the one in first place is soooo far ahead of everyone even second place, that it looks like a money pit.
    My Mercury dime set on the other hand has so much room to grow and improve that it still can be fun and the others in the mercury registry are still having FUN.
    Most #1 set are simply the finest known and there owners are very nice . I'm still trying to get them to send me thier coins for safe keeping.
    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • CarlWohlforthCarlWohlforth Posts: 11,074 ✭
    I remembered that there were no DCAM Roosey's for '52 and '53, then I checked my April pop report. That says 1 each. Now EBL III can get that Roosey set to %100 DCAM.

    Now that I've completed my proof Jeff set I'm getting much more interested in type coins. However there is little chance I'll be anywhere near complete there for many, many years. And when complete the set's score would never be near High Desert or Jim Swan or probably 50 other sets. But I'm still having fun image
    Carl's Coins website w/ links to Carl's auctions
  • littlewicherlittlewicher Posts: 1,822 ✭✭
    There are about 3 collectors that monopolize on the #1 sets. EBL, HoneyCutt and HighDesert. They've all built magnificent sets.


    For some life lasts a short while, but the memories it holds last forever.
    -Laura Swenson

    In memory of BL, SM, and KG. 16 and forever young, rest in peace.
  • goyankeezgoyankeez Posts: 357
    Regarding his dime set, the only real upgrade is to a 1964 70 DCAM, of which 2 are known. The lone 1952 68 DCAM would not help his set any, except for adding another DCAM. The lone 1953 66 DCAM would hurt his set, 68 after bonuses compared to 69 after bonuses which he now has (68 CAM).

    I'm currently collecting this set with 5 coins to go, including the 1952. What he has I cannot find, let alone afford. Truly amazing. Then there's his Franklin set image
    "Buy the coin, not the holder"

    Proof Dime Registry Set
  • CarlWohlforthCarlWohlforth Posts: 11,074 ✭
    Oh, I think he definitely should persue those DCAMs. I would much rather have the %100 DCAM set than one with a slightly better average.

    Perhaps those unique DCAM coins deserve an extra bonus point? image
    Carl's Coins website w/ links to Carl's auctions
  • goyankeezgoyankeez Posts: 357
    I definitely agree with you Carl. An all-DCAM set of Roosevelts would be the ultimate. The pop 1 DCAMs should get like 4 bonus points or something.

    But, the Registry is far from perfect.

    image
    "Buy the coin, not the holder"

    Proof Dime Registry Set
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    I think we should take everyone with the #1 set in every series and put them in suspended animation for at least10 years. Then hope some of those current pop/1 coins get brothers and sisters for the rest of us poor souls to buy. Bearimage
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • HuliganRSHuliganRS Posts: 345 ✭
    image Bear you make me smile!
    ">My PCGS Franklin Registry Set
  • FC57CoinsFC57Coins Posts: 9,140 ✭
    I think Mr. Bear has been watching a few too many Star Trek episodes image

    Live Long and Prosper Mr. Bear - I always get a kick out of your posts.

    Regards,

    Frank
  • solidsolid Posts: 2,975
    On the other hand Bear, maybe some of those guys are in possession of one of
    those special pocketwatches from The Twilight Zone. Maybe they've been putting
    us into suspended animation without our knowing it, whilst they go about
    finding all the good coins... image

  • wondercoinwondercoin Posts: 16,972 ✭✭✭✭✭
    EBL has an incredible set out Proof Franklins for sure! He is a single coin away from perfection - the 1951 Franklin in PCGS-PR67DCAM.

    I was recently consigned the 1951 Franklin in PCGS-PR67DCAM. PM me if you are interested in the coin. image Wondercoin.
    Please visit my website at www.wondercoins.com and my ebay auctions under my user name www.wondercoin.com.
  • WingsruleWingsrule Posts: 3,020 ✭✭✭✭
    I was recently consigned the 1951 Franklin in PCGS-PR67DCAM. PM me if you are interested in the coin. Wondercoin.

    damntheregoesanotherkeyboard.

    PM sent
  • PhillyJoePhillyJoe Posts: 2,701 ✭✭✭✭
    I wonder how many people have suspended their collections and started looking for a 1964 Dime in PR 70 D/C. I can hear Russ now : Got Roosies?

    Joe
    The Philadelphia Mint: making coins since 1792. We make money by making money. Now in our 225th year thanks to no competition. image
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    Here's one of the '64 PR70DCAM Roosevelts. I think the guy is somewhat unrealistic in his value assessment, though.

    Russ, NCNE
    eBay consignment sales | | Collectibles from Resco CCC
  • BearBear Posts: 18,953 ✭✭✭
    Russ - If the price was just 50 dollars less, I would go for it. I just got to save that 50 dollars, because Mrs Bear wants me to get my fur trimmed and she wants me to take her out to koo koo Roos for lunch.

    I think EBL III is very mean keeping all those wonderful coins trapped in his collection. I think he or she, should set them all free , to find new homes with families who will love them. Bearimage
    There once was a place called
    Camelotimage
  • HuliganRSHuliganRS Posts: 345 ✭
    Damn... eBay must have ripped him on listing fees...
    ">My PCGS Franklin Registry Set
  • dbldie55dbldie55 Posts: 7,732 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The listing fee is $3.30. Same as if he asked $1,000,000 or $200.
    Collector and Researcher of Liberty Head Nickels. ANA LM-6053
  • goyankeezgoyankeez Posts: 357
    I remember coming across this auction (1964 70DCAM) when I was searching on ebay. He also had a 1950 PR-68 CAM dime for $1175 open. There were no bidders for that either. I have no problems with a nice heavy frosted 1964 69 DCAM. I think they go for ~$150. image

    A 1964 PR70 DCAM for $9500? I guess the seller figured "Why not?" With the way the Registry set is going and the way some collectors are paying for the numbers on the holder, a pop 2 coin is bound to bring some big bucks. Obviously not $9500 worth. If he relists this with a low opening bid, I'd like to see how high it would go. How much do those top pop state quarters go for?image
    "Buy the coin, not the holder"

    Proof Dime Registry Set
Sign In or Register to comment.