I guess im the only one who doesnt like it. I like my white coins to have a fresh luster to them. The coin is the picture has that kinda creamy luster to it. Still an impressive coin.
Sean J Re-elect Bush in 2004... Dont let the Socialists brainwash you.
KK, I would imagine that the luster, while perhaps not super flashy, is slightly nicer than the scan.
I for one have a devil of a time scanning white, brilliant coins, and getting the luster to show, particularly on my newer scanner. The more brilliant they are, the flatter they seem to come out looking. Oddly, I seem to do better with proofs.
I agree with KK on this one. The luster just doesn't seem 100%. The luster is definitely not superb and the under $3,000 price tends to support this. 67's with exceptional luster and eye appeal have been bringing $3500-4000+.
Do you all think this coin has been dipped? I mean are there really 100+ YO coins that are totally white, not one bit of toning between the denticles?
That is a serious question. I just haven't seen enough classic coins and can't imagine how coins stored in wooden cabinettes or on velvet can remain pure, blast white. Can they?
That's the issue with this half dime. It is blast white as dipping (s) have dulled the luster somewhat. Yeah, PCGS and NGC still give them 67 and 68 grades if they are clean. Original blast white seated coins may have been out there 15-30 years ago when rolls of seated coins were still available at times. Original hoards occasionaly hit the market in the 70's and 80's but for the most part they are gone. I think a blast white coin could have come from such a source. But in the proceeding years before slabs, probably toned somewhat once removed from protected storage. Michael knows a lot about this. Some are still out there but they are rare. Morgan dollar rolls are still common enough to still find orig and blast white. I agree with Michael that at some point in the future, totally original, undipped blast white (or nearly blast white) classic MS type coins will bring hefty premiums and be highly sought after.
I don't mean to poo-poo your sense of eye appeal or taste, but I would never bid on this coin. There is only one reason why this coin is being marketed in a broad sight-unseen forum: it's not really a superior coin by prevailing market standards.
Here's why: the coin, while it may have a high slabbed grade, isn't fresh and original, and it doesn't have full blazing luster one would expect from a superb gem specimen. Especially when it's a common date.
There are those of us who prefer brilliant specimens. That's fine. Brilliant specimens that old can still have a fresh, full, luster to it. This seems like it does not.
Comments
matteproof
Re-elect Bush in 2004... Dont let the Socialists brainwash you.
Bush 2004
Jeb 2008
KK 2016
I for one have a devil of a time scanning white, brilliant coins, and getting the luster to show, particularly on my newer scanner. The more brilliant they are, the flatter they seem to come out looking. Oddly, I seem to do better with proofs.
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
bringing $3500-4000+.
roadrunner
That is a serious question. I just haven't seen enough classic coins and can't imagine how coins stored in wooden cabinettes or on velvet can remain pure, blast white. Can they?
I think a blast white coin could have come from such a source. But in the proceeding years before slabs, probably toned somewhat once removed from protected storage. Michael knows a lot about this. Some are still out there but they are rare. Morgan dollar rolls are still common enough to still find orig and blast white.
I agree with Michael that at some point in the future, totally original, undipped blast white (or nearly blast white) classic MS type coins will bring hefty premiums and be highly sought after.
roadrunner
K S
I don't mean to poo-poo your sense of eye appeal or taste, but I would never bid on this coin. There is only one reason why this coin is being marketed in a broad sight-unseen forum: it's not really a superior coin by prevailing market standards.
Here's why: the coin, while it may have a high slabbed grade, isn't fresh and original, and it doesn't have full blazing luster one would expect from a superb gem specimen. Especially when it's a common date.
There are those of us who prefer brilliant specimens. That's fine. Brilliant specimens that old can still have a fresh, full, luster to it. This seems like it does not.
EVP
How does one get a hater to stop hating?
I can be reached at evillageprowler@gmail.com
I even think the seller seem to inply that the grade given was more generous than the actual grade of the coin.