OK - Now back to coin issues - the dissapointing search
![FC57Coins](https://forums.collectors.com/applications/dashboard/design/images/banned.png)
Last night, whilst most of you were debating the true nature of toned beauty no doubt, I was searching through over 100 modern mint sets that I've had in a box. Now, that's a lot of coins. But what I noticed was that as I pulled the gems out to look at sending them in for grading, there weren't a whole lot of them! Granted I only had time to look at the larger pieces, quarters and up, but even then there were quite a number of them, and most of them (from the 80's forward) had enough dings and nicks on them to take them out of MS65+ status. So my observation is this:
Granted the 2002 mint set is by far the worse quality of the bunch, though the Philadelphia coins were actually not that bad compared to the Denver ones which were hideous. Quality has gone up from the 60's but to still, finding those gems are far and few in between.
Bytheway - I did pluck out about 24 Kennedies that looked muchly yummy so I'll keep you guys posted about them when I get them back.
Regards,
Frank
Granted the 2002 mint set is by far the worse quality of the bunch, though the Philadelphia coins were actually not that bad compared to the Denver ones which were hideous. Quality has gone up from the 60's but to still, finding those gems are far and few in between.
Bytheway - I did pluck out about 24 Kennedies that looked muchly yummy so I'll keep you guys posted about them when I get them back.
Regards,
Frank
0
Comments
Nonetheless, I have a sentimental attachment to these things . . .
Frank