Instead of Classics against Moderns, it should be Circulation coinage against loser proofs.
mdwoods
Posts: 5,546 ✭✭✭
Know what I mean? Mark (flame on)
0
Comments
<< <i>Know what I mean? Mark (flame on) >>
Would love to flame you but figured I should understand your Thread first. :
peacockcoins
Personally, I like collecting Circ coins more, because Proofs are struck perfectly, and are meant to be in perfect shape, but I don't have anything against Proof coins or those who collect them.
Once Russ and some other guys see this thread, you might want to put your flame suit on!
JJacks
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
Russ, NCNE
I thought you would have been more likely to pit varieties against nonvarieties!!!
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
Russ, NCNE
So I guess the buyer must be beneath you crito
Collect what you like and to heck with what someone else thinks.
"The other shriveled chick dollar."
Stop it! It hurts! Im LMAO over here!
Larry
Dabigkahuna
Proofs are the same way. Nope, I like my coins, beaten down by life, worn, used to buy motor oil, or wool socks or anything that meant something to someone. I like them with a few little nicks and ticks, imperfections and dirt that says I was spent, used and saw the seedier parts of humankind (edited for accuracy).
OK so I am a bit dramatic. Problem with proofs is that they are so perfect one just wants to rub them over and over. Kind of like that compulsion one feels to just squeeze a cute little baby's cheek.
Tyler
yes placid, this is true. You neglected to mention it was carolj that bought it though... and we all know she has no class
Russ, I thought that pathetic bird on the back of your Kennedys was full-grown??
-Dave
I have never heard the word "humanhood" before.
I see the fellows that publish the Websters Dictionary haven't either.
Ray
Tyler