That coin is a good reason why people don't want to make a sight unseen market in coins.
It's also a good reason why technical grading is bad grading. If that coin had perfect surfaces and was completely original I personally still would not give it a 63, if it looked like the scans show it to look.
Either this guy is a lousy photographer or that's one ugly (IMHO) coin.
The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
I doubt it. The toning in some areas is quite dark meaning the oxidation is relatively deep. Getting rid of the darker toning would probably strip away most of the luster and leave the coin with that uglier dull washed out look.
The longer I live the more convincing proofs I see of this truth, that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice is it possible for an empire to rise without His aid? Benjamin Franklin
Comments
Camelot
peacockcoins
Is that coin worth bluesheet?
That coin is a good reason why people don't want to make a sight unseen market in coins.
It's also a good reason why technical grading is bad grading. If that coin had perfect surfaces and was completely original I personally still would not give it a 63, if it looked like the scans show it to look.
adrian
anaconda.rare.coins (on eBay)
I doubt it. The toning in some areas is quite dark meaning the oxidation is relatively deep. Getting rid of the darker toning would probably strip away most of the luster and leave the coin with that uglier dull washed out look.
DAN
My first tassa slap 3/3/04
My shiny cents
The half I am getting rid of and me, forever and always Taken in about 1959
B.
A Tax is a fine for doing good.