Take the PCGS Challenge!
jtryka
Posts: 795 ✭
I sent in a few common moderns with my last submission, and decided to have a little fun with them. I am selling two of them on eBay, but as a challenge to slab collectors, I am only allowing bidders to see the coins, not the slab. I doubt they will sell for much, but I am just hoping for newer collectors to see them and think about what they are doing. Here are the links:
Kennedy
Jefferson
Of course I don't expect this to have any impact on the number of folks bidding up prices for moderns just because they have a particular number on the slab.
Kennedy
Jefferson
Of course I don't expect this to have any impact on the number of folks bidding up prices for moderns just because they have a particular number on the slab.
0
Comments
Edited to add:
Well I went up to $6.00 and I'm out. (Isn't that sad????)
Russ, NCNE
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
PS-I hope you like sunny weather and salty air!
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
I sincerely hope eBay allows this type of auction? It borders on a lottery.
peacockcoins
SealyP
ANA certified PCGS slab grade reader.
Positive BST Transactions (buyers and sellers): wondercoin, blu62vette, BAJJERFAN, privatecoin, blu62vette, AlanLastufka, privatecoin
#1 1951 Bowman Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#2 1980 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
#8 (and climbing) 1972 Topps Los Angeles Rams Team Set
my hotels
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
peacockcoins
When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.
Thomas Paine
<< <i>Ha Ha Ha Ha...I love it! You have just confirmed what I have always thought...PCGS plastic has a market value, irregardless of what's in it or what it grades. >>
Watch you talkin about Willis?
peacockcoins
Fair enough, but hopefully you can see there is a significant difference (aside from the mintmark) between your 1997 half and Dog97's?
Hint: The Dog coin isn't.
<< <i>Watch you talkin about Willis? >>
LMAO!!!
A for the difference, I can plainly see that Dog's coin is a lot nicer than mine, but don't ask me to assign a number, much less a value. I don't really know moderns very well as I don't collect them, except for my sets in Dansco albums. About the only exception I would place on what I see as slab mania it the Kennedy series. Not that I am crazy for the design, but that at least there are some more sane mintage figures. Case in point, less than 20 million 1999 halves minted between Philly and Denver, compared to what, like 4.4 billion state quarters? That's just nuts.
As a classic collector, I would pay $0.50 for my coin, and probably $10 for Dog's coin (no offense Dog). Take the difference in my prices and whatever the going rate is for modern collectors, and then you will see the size of the gulf that stands between Classic and Modern collectors understanding each other. Note I used the word understanding, not respecting, as I believe we should, no we must respect each other even if we don't understand each others likes and preferences in collecting.
Note I used the word understanding, not respecting, as I believe we should, no we must respect each other even if we don't understand each others likes and preferences in collecting.
If you say so. Gotta go now -- need to put up an eBay auction with a raw 1916-D Mercury and see how many classic collectors will bid without seeing the reverse.
I see no problem with it.
My guess on the Jeff? 68 DCAM.
MS64 for the half.
Now there are many MS-67 and a $900 MS-68.
See the $867 difference?
The cool thing about many moderns is that there's a huge "money" grade, and since so many coins are submitted going for that grade, there is a glut at one lower grade -- which often drives the price down to absurdly cheap levels compared to the effort and cost in finding and certifying one.
Thank your local Registry Set collector today!