CRACK OUTS VERSUS CROSSOVERS
fletch2645
Posts: 119
I know this has been discussed on this forum before, but I just wanted to report the results of a test I recently concluded at PCGS. I'm starting a Morgan Dollar Registry set and I had several Morgans in ANACS, NGC, PCI, ICG, and (yipes) a couple in ACG holders that needed to be in PCGS holders to be included in the Registry set program. To conduct the test, I chose 1 coin from each grading service to be crossed over. To make sure that they would cross, I chose only what I considered to be very high quality examples for the grade and indicated on the submission form a minimum acceptable grade of 2 points lower than the existing grade. The rest of the coins that were in these holders (17 in all) were cracked out and submitted raw to see what the results would be.
Results: Of the 5 crossovers submitted, 4 did not cross and were sent back to me. Strangely enough, the only coin to cross was an ICG graded coin. Of the 17 submitted raw, I had 6 come back in the same grade, 8 come back in a higher grade(1 point in 6 cases and 2 points in 2 cases), and 2 come back in a lower grade (only 1 point in each case). One was body bagged saying it had been cleaned (an NGC MS65 coin).
These were the actual results and I'm not complaining because I got some decent upgrades out of this test. Number 1, I think it proves that PCGS graders have "slab bias". Number 2, grading standards are definitely not consistent from grading service to grading service, let alone within the same grading service. Go figure!!
Results: Of the 5 crossovers submitted, 4 did not cross and were sent back to me. Strangely enough, the only coin to cross was an ICG graded coin. Of the 17 submitted raw, I had 6 come back in the same grade, 8 come back in a higher grade(1 point in 6 cases and 2 points in 2 cases), and 2 come back in a lower grade (only 1 point in each case). One was body bagged saying it had been cleaned (an NGC MS65 coin).
These were the actual results and I'm not complaining because I got some decent upgrades out of this test. Number 1, I think it proves that PCGS graders have "slab bias". Number 2, grading standards are definitely not consistent from grading service to grading service, let alone within the same grading service. Go figure!!
0
Comments
Endo
Regards,
Frank