Did someone go nuts on the Bullet sale for Proof Lincolns?
sonofagunk
Posts: 1,349 ✭✭
1968-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . $2,990
1969-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . . $949
1971-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . .$11,500
1974-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . . $178
1975-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . $1,150
1976-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . $1,208
1977-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,725
1978-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,553
1979-S.T-II . .PR69DCAM. . . . . $236
1980-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,524
1981-S.T-I. . .PR69DCAM. . . . . .$15
1981-S.T-II . .PR69DCAM. . . . . $178
1983-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $748
1984-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $529
1985-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $224
1986-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,840
1988-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . . .$95
1989-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,006
1991-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $247
1991-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $460
1992-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,064
1993-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $236
1994-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,064
1996-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,093
1969-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . . $949
1971-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . .$11,500
1974-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . . $178
1975-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . $1,150
1976-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . $1,208
1977-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,725
1978-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,553
1979-S.T-II . .PR69DCAM. . . . . $236
1980-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,524
1981-S.T-I. . .PR69DCAM. . . . . .$15
1981-S.T-II . .PR69DCAM. . . . . $178
1983-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $748
1984-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $529
1985-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $224
1986-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,840
1988-S. . . . .PR69DCAM. . . . . .$95
1989-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,006
1991-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $247
1991-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $460
1992-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,064
1993-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . . $236
1994-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,064
1996-S. . . . .PR70DCAM. . . . $1,093
eBay Error Sales
0
Comments
peacockcoins
<< <i>Dang- I had no idea some of these were so tough to find. >>
That's because there were no PR6DCAMs
Is that just PCGS or all Services?
Follow up question: Is this also because these sets haven't been cherried yet or is the 69DCAM just impossible with some of these?
peacockcoins
PR SIX DCAM's not PR SIXTY-NINE DCAM's
<< <i>Follow up question: Is this also because these sets haven't been cherried yet or is the 69DCAM just impossible with some of these? >>
I think the set are all cherried out, and yes it is very tough, I have been trying to make a 71-S in a 69DCAM for years (at 11 grand you can see why).
Will we see a new number one in the proofs soon?
Rich
<< <i>If the number is not a single digit graded coin braddick won't collect it!!! >>
Is that single digit as in pops, or single digit as in grade ("1")?
peacockcoins
Russ, NCNE
Pete
Whether or not the set shows up on the registry someday remains to be seen. My guess is that sooner or later the set will be listed because the dealer is well-known for building registry sets.
I wonder if the prices in that auction will (1) encourage some collectors to sell some of their proofs and/or (2) send many coin-sharpies into a frenzy seeking out additional proof sets in the hopes of finding some high grades - it seems PCGS is through with PR70DCAMs for a while, but low-pop 69s should be doable.
crazy prices.
What do tulips, dot.com stocks, and super-high grade proofs have in common?
Jim