An interesting comparison of 1967 SMS Kennedy halves.
Russ
Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
1967 SMS half number one:
1967 SMS half number two:
One of these had a BIN of $69, the other a BIN of $1250. Kind of hard to justify buying the higher priced one.
Russ, NCNE
1967 SMS half number two:
One of these had a BIN of $69, the other a BIN of $1250. Kind of hard to justify buying the higher priced one.
Russ, NCNE
0
Comments
69 on thr bottom
<< <i>1250 on top
69 on thr bottom >>
Nope. The top one is in a 66CAM holder, the bottom in a 67DCAM holder. Awfully fine line for an 18 fold price difference.
Russ, NCNE
Russ, NCNE
al h.
I knew you were looking at it, that's why I grabbed it. Bwuahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
Russ, NCNE
al h.
Take a look at this "under the radar purchase"! I was really only trying to help a fellow board member, but happily won. It is a stunner!
1966 PCGS MS67 Cam Kennedy
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
I actually had that one on my list, but didn't bid because you were in it. No mercy next time.
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>No mercy next time >>
Ah yes... prophetic words.
The "hunter" becomes the "hunted".
En garde'
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
I thought I felt the earth (stock market) tremble when I read that line. Getting into bidding wars over
moderns among forum members is what jacks the price up on these things. Yes, work it out amongst
yourselves and trade off once in awhile. But if you must have some thousandth of a point lead to feed your egos, then hell yes, go for it.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
Er - that may have been foghorn leghorn.
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
does SMS stand for Superb Mint State?
BTW, i thought the top one (66) had better fields than the bottom one (67). How'd it graade lower?
B.
just noticed. . .my 100th post. yea!
A Tax is a fine for doing good.
"Special Mint Set", I believe.
I've now read your post five or six times, and I'm still trying to figure out what you're ranting about.
BlueCole,
Dan is correct. The mint didn't produce proof sets in the years '65-'67. Instead, they produced Special Mint Sets - sort of a tweener coin, not quite a proof, but not quite a business strike.
Russ, NCNE
B.
A Tax is a fine for doing good.
certainly a nice coin but hardly remarkable for cameo effect on a '67 half. The
second coin was no doubt bid up for it's incredible contrast. While the date isn't
overly tough, it's contrast is extreme.
<< <i>The second coin was no doubt bid up for it's incredible contrast. >>
It didn't sell. Had an opening bid of $850, and a BIN of $1250.
<< <i>While the date isn't overly tough, it's contrast is extreme. >>
Not extreme enough to justify a price of 18 times as much as the other.
Russ, NCNE
This is one I made raw from a SMS. Take a guess, and I'll reveal in a later post.
Obverse
reverse
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Russ, NCNE
Slab
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor