Home PSA Set Registry Forum

1970 Kellogg's grading

Just picked up a set of 1970 Kellogg's today. Any tips on grading -- what to look for, avoid, etc. Thanks.
Where have you gone Dave Vargha
CU turns its lonely eyes to you
What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
Vargha bucks have left and gone away?

hey hey hey
hey hey hey

Comments

  • Psa1965topps, I can only share my vast knowledge of Kellogg's grading tips if you swear that you will sell me all of your future 10's image.
  • theBobstheBobs Posts: 1,136 ✭✭
    Deal.
    Where have you gone Dave Vargha
    CU turns its lonely eyes to you
    What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
    Vargha bucks have left and gone away?

    hey hey hey
    hey hey hey
  • Top Secret Information Deleted
  • theBobstheBobs Posts: 1,136 ✭✭
    Thanks. Very well thought out. The surface is the thing that seems most challenging.

    Thanks again.

    Brian
    Where have you gone Dave Vargha
    CU turns its lonely eyes to you
    What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
    Vargha bucks have left and gone away?

    hey hey hey
    hey hey hey
  • theBobstheBobs Posts: 1,136 ✭✭
    Gemmint,

    Thanks for the great write up. I recently was contacted by another board member who I have traded the set to. The offer was to great to pass up, so if the set does grade any 10s, I will be unable sell those to you.

    I had no idea that Kellogg's were this hot.

    Brian
    Where have you gone Dave Vargha
    CU turns its lonely eyes to you
    What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
    Vargha bucks have left and gone away?

    hey hey hey
    hey hey hey
  • Hey that's not fair! I give you top secret Kellogg's information, and I come away with nothing? I won't forget this.

    image


  • << <i>Hey that's not fair! I give you top secret Kellogg's information, and I come away with nothing? I won't forget this. >>


    So, are you going to start collecting 1965's to get revenge. image

    Robert
    Looking for:
    Any high grade OPC Jim Palmer
    High grade Redskins (pre 1980)
  • thegemmintmanthegemmintman Posts: 3,101 ✭✭
    Exactly. It's a mistake to upset Gemmint like that image.
  • theBobstheBobs Posts: 1,136 ✭✭


    << <i>Exactly. It's a mistake to upset Gemmint like that >>



    If you start driving the prices of PSA 6 and 7 1965 Topps up on ebay, I will be very upset and your revenge will be complete.
    Where have you gone Dave Vargha
    CU turns its lonely eyes to you
    What's the you say, Mrs Robinson
    Vargha bucks have left and gone away?

    hey hey hey
    hey hey hey
  • Why are 1970 Kellogg's becoming so popular?
    It's all good...
  • mikeschmidtmikeschmidt Posts: 5,756 ✭✭✭
    Availability.

    Populations to support a number of PSA 9 sets is one of the key factors in people being attracted to the set to collect it. 1964 Topps Giants is another example of this.

    1915 Cracker Jack (in PSA 8) is a perfect example -- especially when compared to 1914 Cracker Jack.

    There is a certain critical mass which I define as PSA 8 and higher for pre-1960 cards and PSA 9 and higher for some post-1960 sets that are necessary to have a large collecting public follow the set.
    I am actively buying MIKE SCHMIDT gem mint baseball cards. Also looking for any 19th century cabinets of Philadephia Nationals. Please PM with additional details.
Sign In or Register to comment.