Need a High Relief Saint Expert
Blade
Posts: 1,744 ✭
This one has stumped me for a while. What is the verdict on a Proof High Relief? Heritage has offered several of these for sale in the past and has one in the current Internet auction:
In a previous Heritage catalog, they claimed that the Proof HRs have subtle distinguishing characteristics and were likely hit with the press a few more times. They also stated that some of the minor details are sharper. However, all of the Proof HRs that I have seen are in NGC slabs. When I checked PCGS's Pop Reports, they don't even list a HR in Proof. Does that mean they do not recognize these coins as Proof? The proofs do carry a price premium of approx. 50%. The last (4) MS64 HRs in the Heritage archives went for $14,375-$18,400. The last (3) PR64s in the archives sold for $22,435-$25,300.
So what is the verdict? Are these just exceptionally well struck Mint State coins or Proofs? What if you tried to cross one to PCGS? The Red Book says that matte/roman finish proofs were first struck in 1908. So... what are these?
Edited to remove link
In a previous Heritage catalog, they claimed that the Proof HRs have subtle distinguishing characteristics and were likely hit with the press a few more times. They also stated that some of the minor details are sharper. However, all of the Proof HRs that I have seen are in NGC slabs. When I checked PCGS's Pop Reports, they don't even list a HR in Proof. Does that mean they do not recognize these coins as Proof? The proofs do carry a price premium of approx. 50%. The last (4) MS64 HRs in the Heritage archives went for $14,375-$18,400. The last (3) PR64s in the archives sold for $22,435-$25,300.
So what is the verdict? Are these just exceptionally well struck Mint State coins or Proofs? What if you tried to cross one to PCGS? The Red Book says that matte/roman finish proofs were first struck in 1908. So... what are these?
Edited to remove link
Tom
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
0
Comments
That photo on the auction page should be a little better for a coin like that you would think.
The Red Book says "all HR proof are experimental or trial pieces."
The two folds on her skirt to the right of her right leg seems to match the discription of the "experimental" or "trial" peices but I can't tell if there are 13 or 14 rays on the reverse? The regular HR have 13. At least from from what I read?
Larry
Dabigkahuna
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
You are right - that pic should be better for a $20K coin. Here is one slightly nicer with a better pic
Edited to remove link
NOTE: No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Type collector since 1981
Current focus 1855 date type set
At least I think that's right, I recall reading it somewhere. Unless it was about some other proof gold. I tend not to retain information that will have no practical application in my own collecting anytime soon.