Why ask for collector opinions, then completely ignore everyone?
Monstavet
Posts: 1,235 ✭✭
What is the point of PCGS asking for constructive criticism of their proposed weights, and then completely ignoring the feedback they receive? Not just sour grapes here that they ignored my ideas on the Jefferson weights, but they didn't make any of the changes that Frank or anyone else suggested either, that I can tell.
I guess PCGS doesn't give a rip, but I am thinking I will pull my registry sets in protest. This changing of the rules after the game has started pisses me off.
I guess PCGS doesn't give a rip, but I am thinking I will pull my registry sets in protest. This changing of the rules after the game has started pisses me off.
Send Email or PM for free veterinary advice.
0
Comments
See next.
PCGS answers to its stock holders, PERIOD. The majority of which, I assume, are the big wigs we all know.
Therefore, your, mine, and everyone elses' opinions are reviewed, but, in the end consideration is given to what is in the best interest of the "company". I'm sure all ideas are reviewed. But, prior to opening up weighting for comments, I believe ideas submitted have already been considered. I can't believe new ideas by Registry Members have gone unconsidered. Therefore, I believe "new" ideas are previously considered ideas, implemented as a way of allowing "members" to feel a sense of 'belonging".
IMHO
DAM
Have a great week end,
Ray
I don't mind speculation- it's fun and informative to read, but it should be grounded in a tidbit of fact.
peacockcoins
Plain and simple. but hey PCGS is #1 so nothing you will do can ever matter. Just ask most on this board.
How about you and PCGS?
peacockcoins
Have they weighted Liberty Nickels? ( I think not )
I was being pretty honest in my answer though. I should have a friend of mine buy them, but I doubt he would want a losing investment (yes, it would be pocket change)
Frank thought it was a good idea, do you disagree? It is nothing against the company, but if no one tells them what they are doing wrong, they will not figure it out until they have nothing left. (hate to lose my holders). If they count on people who know nothing about the business (most of the stock holders), then they have already lost the business.
peacockcoins
Tim
Registry News
Pennies make dollars, and dollars make slabs!
....inflation must be kicking in again this dollar says spend by Dec. 31 2004!
Erik
are we entering our collections into the PCGS Registry because we enjoy sharing it with other like-minded collectors and the format allows us to see where others are at, where they're headed and in some instances to view their individual coins? or are we there to strut our assembled coins and hold the bragging rights for awhile that we're number whatever? those seem to be the two camps on-board.
as for me and my set, i don't have any intentions of getting wrapped up in it so much that i would "cut off my nose to spite my face" as you said in the opener, mark. you've built a nice set with patient effort and help from many listed above and below you. you've helped me unselfishly to improve my collection. what would running really accomplish besides helping me move up a notch?
if someone amongst us has the time to draft some kind of a request in the form of an e-mail petition to circulate, perhaps some of us involved could forward something through the proper channels to see if further changes could be made. no need to complain, better to act in some fashion. i'd be willing to help however i can.
al h.
my set
sincerely michael
you're ahead of me because they have my grade points calculated wrong, an obvious data entry error or something. if you look at my set off the earlier posted link you'll see i have one 68DCAM which should put my grade at a bit under 69. it seems they got the set grade right despite that and i'm sure they'll correct it eventually.
al h.