Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Opinions on this $10 Lib?

CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,347 ✭✭✭✭✭

I do not own this coin. I would like to hear your opinion of it.

Comments

  • Options
    RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I bet the coin looks better than the TrueView depicts.
    That one heck of a biggie "S".

  • Options
    lermishlermish Posts: 4,837 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like it was maybe semi-PL and a bit wipey but probably acceptable, but hard to tell through the too bright lighting. Don't see stars that weak too often.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • Options
    blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 7,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Certainly, rubbed, wiped, and perhaps even whizzed. RGDS!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
    Retiring at 55, what day is today? :sunglasses:

  • Options
    lermishlermish Posts: 4,837 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Here's a better resolution picture. My personal GTG was one notch below what the actual grade is.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • Options
    TypekatTypekat Posts: 711 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks ok to me as AU53 or so.
    We should cut the new SF mint some slack on the stars, it was their 1st year in business!

    30+ years coin shop experience (ret.) Coins, bullion, currency, scrap & interesting folks. Loved every minute!

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,921 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’ll guess AU55.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 3,289 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 15, 2026 9:53AM

    I like it; nice example. Plus, it’s from the first year of the old SF mint!

    Here’s my 1854-S Eagle for comparison:

    I think mine might have a few more scuffs/hairlines but is a little more lustrous. My guess, then, is AU55.

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian
    Copperindian II
    Indy Eagles
    Gold Rush

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian
    Nickelodeon
    Early Walkers

    Successful transactions: redraider, winesteven, renomedphys, splitaces, oreville, ajaan, Cent1225, onlyroosies, justindan, blitzdude, DesertMoon, johnnyb, Heubschgold, SunshineRareCoins, ParadimeCoins, ndeagles, Southern_Knights, pcgsregistrycollector

  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,934 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 14, 2026 6:43PM

    It’s a good looking coin with nice luster. However there is a black area on reverse above rt wing which I don’t like. Looks like a black smudge - toning or to be more specific biological attack? I would grade it AU53. I do like its nice luster. But it’s not PQ - seems like some slide marks. And then of course - black area. Rt obv field again blackish area and some slide marks.

    Can’t see it priced more than above 10-20 pct over CDN bid.

    Investor
  • Options
    tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,662 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Love the date! The coin is somewhere between 50 and 55 depending on how bad that obverse is in hand

  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat Posts: 24,491 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I see this as a challenge to handicap… I am not confident that the image captures the essence of the coin. I suspect it is in the low AU spectrum, but there are surface questions that can best be resolved by an in hand review. Good luck with your review and welcome to the challenges in terms of finding original No Motto Gold.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options
    TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 45,097 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks AU55 with subdued luster. But the interesting thing is that it looks to be struck through a mint bag or canvas, around 5 o’oclock, in the obverse field. Not sure if that’s an ejection mark or a nick in the neck. Overall, quite pleasing to me.

  • Options
    WalkerfanWalkerfan Posts: 10,332 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it. Solid example. Looks like a mid-range AU.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,934 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Marks rt obv field - sliding on counter?

    Investor
  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,593 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would agree with 55. Better pics would help.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    P0CKETCHANGEP0CKETCHANGE Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The TrueView makes it look scratchy. Hard to tell if that’s just a harsh photo, or true to the in-hand appearance. The darker areas indicate that the coin originally had semi-PL surfaces, the effect of which still remains to some extent.

    The really bright areas at the tops stars, date, etc. bother me, but again may be an artifact of photography. If it’s CAC-approved I would give it the benefit of the doubt, but would definitely want to examine in-hand.

    Nothing is as expensive as free money.

  • Options
    skier07skier07 Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The pictures aren’t helping the coin but based on what I see the coin is too light for my taste and the surfaces are scratchy.

  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,729 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU58; very nice luster.

  • Options
    burdellburdell Posts: 59 ✭✭✭✭

    DLRC for sale MAY 2024:

    Hansen TV NOV 2019:

    Heritage SEP 2016:

  • Options
    CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,347 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks folks. @burdell found it. I really like the reverse die crack at M but find the gouge at the bottom curl at back of the neck quite distracting. Definitely searching for the right 54S $10 to add to my meager collection. Don't think this one is it but fun thread. :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file