I was spending time with my wife and daughters sorry you missed me. Once again when a poster responds with some data from a legit study that shows that most men do not find women between the ages of 18-25 the most attractive I will respond. That was my point that I posted. I will not respond to nonsense and asinine comments that one would hear at a comic book convention.
I suggest you read the thread from the beginning and see what poster started the nonsense of going after a poster and not contributing/debating the topic. It was not me.
@Yankees70 said:
I was spending time with my wife and daughters sorry you missed me. Once again when a poster responds with some data from a legit study that shows that most men do not find women between the ages of 18-25 the most attractive I will respond. That was my point that I posted. I will not respond to nonsense and asinine comments that one would hear at a comic book convention.
I suggest you read the thread from the beginning and see what poster started the nonsense of going after a poster and not contributing/debating the topic. It was not me.
I responded with data from a real study. You were wrong. I didn't care other than to prove you were wrong.
Military Strategy: In warfare, the "high ground" (hills) provides a significant strategic advantage. Taking or holding these positions often resulted in the bloodiest fighting. Historically, commanders had to decide whether an objective was worth the massive cost in casualties, giving rise to the concept of a "hill worth dying on."
@Yankees70 said:
I was spending time with my wife and daughters sorry you missed me. Once again when a poster responds with some data from a legit study that shows that most men do not find women between the ages of 18-25 the most attractive I will respond. That was my point that I posted. I will not respond to nonsense and asinine comments that one would hear at a comic book convention.
I suggest you read the thread from the beginning and see what poster started the nonsense of going after a poster and not contributing/debating the topic. It was not me.
I responded with data from a real study. You were wrong. I didn't care other than to prove you were wrong.
Is this supposed to be serious? If so let's make a bet. I will take the ages I listed and you pick what years you believe MOST men are attracted to. I will bet you any amount you want up to 25K and I'm 100 percent serious. If you are interested we can set this up in a day. I have done similar bets many times and its all legit. If you come back with insults or other weird comments that one would hear at a comic book shop then I'm ending my discussion in this thread. I'm not wasting my time on nonsense. I honestly can't believe anyone thinks that most men prefer women over 25 but its a free country and if you want to believe it lets roll.
@Yankees70 said:
I was spending time with my wife and daughters sorry you missed me. Once again when a poster responds with some data from a legit study that shows that most men do not find women between the ages of 18-25 the most attractive I will respond. That was my point that I posted. I will not respond to nonsense and asinine comments that one would hear at a comic book convention.
I suggest you read the thread from the beginning and see what poster started the nonsense of going after a poster and not contributing/debating the topic. It was not me.
I responded with data from a real study. You were wrong. I didn't care other than to prove you were wrong.
Is this supposed to be serious? If so let's make a bet. I will take the ages I listed and you pick what years you believe MOST men are attracted to. I will bet you any amount you want up to 25K and I'm 100 percent serious. If you are interested we can set this up in a day. I have done similar bets many times and its all legit. If you come back with insults or other weird comments that one would hear at a comic book shop then I'm ending my discussion in this thread. I'm not wasting my time on nonsense. I honestly can't believe anyone thinks that most men prefer women over 25 but its a free country and if you want to believe it lets roll.
CURRENT VEGAS LINE IF YOU TAKE ME UP ON THE BET:
Yes you man up and take the bet +2500
No is -5000
It was a serious study. How would we determine the winner of your bet? Ask the morons you work with?
@ElMagoStrikeZone said:
Don’t think I’ve ever participated in a forum where one person tried so hard to be disliked.
They both seem to be itchin' for a bannin'
There are studies on forums and other online communities which I find interesting. Online communities have been mapped in these studies from inception to creation to growth on to maturity and eventually death. There is enough data on the matter that you can predict when it will happen based on the rule of participation inequality.
These communities don't collapse - rather they starve out. This happens because of a few main reasons, but here I see the primary concerns of newcomer starvation and culture erosion. The heavy contributors here stomp on new users (I stomp on them in return - it's the circle of life) and that reduces new contributions except from new un-socialized users, which produces more lurking until occasionally community collapse occurs. It would be best to avoid 1950's thinking where possible to create a more inviting environment for people with WORKING BRAINS!
@ElMagoStrikeZone said: Military Strategy: In warfare, the "high ground" (hills) provides a significant strategic advantage. Taking or holding these positions often resulted in the bloodiest fighting. Historically, commanders had to decide whether an objective was worth the massive cost in casualties, giving rise to the concept of a "hill worth dying on."
I don't know about you, but sometimes it's fun to talk about nothing... even if it is AROD's GF. ever since I fell on hard times and lost my TMZ subscription I just haven't been able to keep track of who is dating who in the sports world.
AND
if you would have told me yankees70 was pullin' TENS... I would have called you a liar!
Guys keep it down. Y’all are gona bring attention to PSA and personally I can’t afford to spend 89.99 plus shipping both ways to grade my 1958
Mantle all star card even if I get an 8. Ugh
Comments
I notice @Yankees70 has shut up which is his natural state after being corrected.
I was spending time with my wife and daughters sorry you missed me. Once again when a poster responds with some data from a legit study that shows that most men do not find women between the ages of 18-25 the most attractive I will respond. That was my point that I posted. I will not respond to nonsense and asinine comments that one would hear at a comic book convention.
I suggest you read the thread from the beginning and see what poster started the nonsense of going after a poster and not contributing/debating the topic. It was not me.
I responded with data from a real study. You were wrong. I didn't care other than to prove you were wrong.
Military Strategy: In warfare, the "high ground" (hills) provides a significant strategic advantage. Taking or holding these positions often resulted in the bloodiest fighting. Historically, commanders had to decide whether an objective was worth the massive cost in casualties, giving rise to the concept of a "hill worth dying on."
I like to do swat - golden bridge - swat - golden bridge - swat - golden bridge.
LOL, that pic is filtered all to heck.
Is this supposed to be serious? If so let's make a bet. I will take the ages I listed and you pick what years you believe MOST men are attracted to. I will bet you any amount you want up to 25K and I'm 100 percent serious. If you are interested we can set this up in a day. I have done similar bets many times and its all legit. If you come back with insults or other weird comments that one would hear at a comic book shop then I'm ending my discussion in this thread. I'm not wasting my time on nonsense. I honestly can't believe anyone thinks that most men prefer women over 25 but its a free country and if you want to believe it lets roll.
CURRENT VEGAS LINE IF YOU TAKE ME UP ON THE BET:
Yes you man up and take the bet +2500
No is -5000
Haha
, I still will give "Plain ole Jane" some love 
Looks like a different mouth. 👄
It was a serious study. How would we determine the winner of your bet? Ask the morons you work with?
Don’t think I’ve ever participated in a forum where one person tried so hard to be disliked.
Nice double entendre.
They both seem to be itchin' for a bannin'
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me (2025)
There are studies on forums and other online communities which I find interesting. Online communities have been mapped in these studies from inception to creation to growth on to maturity and eventually death. There is enough data on the matter that you can predict when it will happen based on the rule of participation inequality.
These communities don't collapse - rather they starve out. This happens because of a few main reasons, but here I see the primary concerns of newcomer starvation and culture erosion. The heavy contributors here stomp on new users (I stomp on them in return - it's the circle of life) and that reduces new contributions except from new un-socialized users, which produces more lurking until occasionally community collapse occurs. It would be best to avoid 1950's thinking where possible to create a more inviting environment for people with WORKING BRAINS!
What the Heck is going on with this thread?
Excitement brewing
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me (2025)
I don't know about you, but sometimes it's fun to talk about nothing... even if it is AROD's GF. ever since I fell on hard times and lost my TMZ subscription I just haven't been able to keep track of who is dating who in the sports world.
AND
if you would have told me yankees70 was pullin' TENS... I would have called you a liar!
This is what happens to people who outgrow attending summer camp.
Haha. Give her your number. You never know!
Guys keep it down. Y’all are gona bring attention to PSA and personally I can’t afford to spend 89.99 plus shipping both ways to grade my 1958
Mantle all star card even if I get an 8. Ugh
I sent her a message saying she could be my GOLD and I can be her SILVER (on youtube of course
)