Home U.S. Coin Forum

New Fresh Error Coin - Double Denomination - Dual Dated

RampageRampage Posts: 9,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

Here is a coin I recently acquired raw. Unfortunately, it has a bit of environmental damage, but it is a cool error nonetheless in my opinion.


Comments

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 39,377 ✭✭✭✭✭

    must have had help

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 4,039 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MsMorrisine said:
    must have had help

    Hardly. The dime could have been struck on December 31, and the cent on January 1 (give or take a holiday).

    Once you allow that double-denominations can happen at all, it would be surprising if some of them DIDN'T cross a year boundary

  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,425 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 17, 2026 7:28PM

    @Rampage said:
    Here is a coin I recently acquired raw. Unfortunately, it has a bit of environmental damage, but it is a cool error nonetheless in my opinion.

    I'm not sure "cool error" is the correct term. Wouldn't "spectacular error" be more suitable?

    A double denomination error would be great, as would a coin struck twice with two different dates. But add them both together?

  • GoobGoob Posts: 427 ✭✭✭✭

    That’s an incredible error coin!
    Too bad it details graded…
    (Though I wouldn’t imagine that’d hurt an error coin of that caliber too much)

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • alefzeroalefzero Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My 11c piece.

  • MWallaceMWallace Posts: 4,631 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with @JBK
    That is a "spectacular error".

  • ShurkeShurke Posts: 780 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This is seriously cool!

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 25,103 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Seriously, such a cool overall look and presentation.
    (I'd think that wee-bit of 'environmental damage' at 12:00 on the obverse could easily be removed.)

    A great and important coin!
    Thanks for sharing it.

  • MWallaceMWallace Posts: 4,631 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @alefzero said:
    My 11c piece.

    Cool error but not "Dual Dated".

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MWallace said:

    @alefzero said:
    My 11c piece.

    )

    Cool error but not "Dual Dated".

    If struck on a ten cent planchet, I'd agree.
    Struck on a ten-cent piece, it is likely to show remnants of the dime's date and thus would be dual dated.
    Dual dates doesn't mean the dates have to be different dates....

  • RampageRampage Posts: 9,658 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thank you guys. I was thrilled to have been able to pick it up. It just arrived back from NGC this afternoon.

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 33,822 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MsMorrisine said:
    must have had help

    I respectfully disagree.

    Numismatist. 54 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Also won the PNG's Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • alefzeroalefzero Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RedRocket said:

    @MWallace said:

    @alefzero said:
    My 11c piece.

    )

    Cool error but not "Dual Dated".

    If struck on a ten cent planchet, I'd agree.
    Struck on a ten-cent piece, it is likely to show remnants of the dime's date and thus would be dual dated.
    Dual dates doesn't mean the dates have to be different dates....

    Here is as much of the date that is visible. Faint, but the last digit looks to be a 4.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file