This new Lincoln is Red & Brown
There was a local one day show I nearly forgot about yesterday until a buddy texted me to ask if I was going...
I didn't have a bunch of money to spend but that's never really a problem for me, I can always find stuff I like without spending big bucks.
This is one of a few colorful Lincolns I picked up, It's bright red on the obverse and definitley brown on the reverse... Jekyll & Hyde.
The dealer who showed it to me initially handed it over with the reverse up... without turning it over, I assumed it was a double mint set toner from the 50's.
Nope. 1929 MS65 RB

Comments
-
That is a really neat wheat cent! I wonder what caused the coin to look like that.
"Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
- Someone, probably0 -
Nice. Old album toned reverse.
Something I never noticed about the 1929 dates. Is the 2 a tiny bit high, or is the second 9 a tiny bit low? (BTW, I checked, they are all like this, so its on the hub.) I would guess that the Engraver put the second 9 a tiny bit low.
Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.0 -
@CaptHenway said:
Nice. Old album toned reverse.Something I never noticed about the 1929 dates. Is the 2 a tiny bit high, or is the second 9 a tiny bit low? (BTW, I checked, they are all like this, so its on the hub.) I would guess that the Engraver put the second 9 a tiny bit low.
Weird. I never noticed either. The 2 looks high to me.
0 -
@Meltdown said:
@CaptHenway said:
Nice. Old album toned reverse.Something I never noticed about the 1929 dates. Is the 2 a tiny bit high, or is the second 9 a tiny bit low? (BTW, I checked, they are all like this, so its on the hub.) I would guess that the Engraver put the second 9 a tiny bit low.
Weird. I never noticed either. The 2 looks high to me.
That might be an optical illusion. When the Engraver changed the date from 1928 to 1929 there was no need to re-do the 2.
Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.1 -
High 2 yes, its interesting in any case
0
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 520.1K Coins and Currency - PCGS
- 328.6K U.S. Coin Forum
- 14.8K PCGS Set Registry Forum
- 5.2K Q & A Forum
- 41.4K World & Ancient Coins Forum
- 3K U.S. & World Currency Forum
- 96.4K Buy, Sell, & Trade - U.S. Coins
- 7.3K Buy, Sell & Trade - World & Ancient Coins
- 1.5K Buy, Sell & Trade - Currency
- 61 Random
- 246.2K Trading Cards, Autographs and Memorabilia - PSA
- 90.3K Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
- 1.7K Autographs Forum
- 16.4K PSA Set Registry Forum
- 22K Sports Talk
- 115K Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
- 663 Buy, Sell & Trade - Autographs
- 2.2K Stamps
- 1.5K Stamps Forum
- 670 Buy, Sell & Trade - Stamps
- 83 Coin Shows
- 83 General Coin Show Information and Discussion
- 11.9K Misc
- 11.9K Testing Forum


