Better date Morgan

logger7

How would you grade this 1895-o Morgan?

ChrisH821

Put me in the 64+ camp.

Morgan13

I'm going to say 63.
Looks like a decent coin.

johnny9434

im at ms 63 as well
nice coin

coastaljerseyguy

I'd say 62 or 63.

The_Dinosaur_Man

I'm also 62 or 63.

LeeBone

Big coin.
They're tough on these.
Could go anywhere from 58(I personally would not hope so) up to 63

jacrispies

My guess is MS-64 from these photos.

Coinscratch

63

nwcoast

I’m going 64, though it’s hard to guess luster from the pics.

Walkerguy21D

@LeeBone said:
Big coin.
They're tough on these.
Could go anywhere from 58(I personally would not hope so) up to 63

Agree.
Looks like a trace of rub or friction on the cheek, but reverse looks full ms. Guessing it gets a pass, but muted luster keeps it at 63.

Rampage

Based on the pictures alone, I would take a stab at MS61. If I see it in hand, maybe I would consider otherwise.

Rampage

By the way, it looks like a nice coin and a tough one at that. I have to be temporarily happy with my XF45 that's been in my collection for 15 years until I get a better one. I still need six dates to complete my set,

MFeld

I’m going to ignore the date of the coin and assess it as I would a common date. As such, I don’t know why it shouldn’t grade MS63 at a minimum.

ProofCollection

Yep, 63 all day barring any issues that can be seen in the photo.

jfriedm56

Nice coin. I’ll take a shot at MS64, but I’d really like to see it again under a different light source. There’s little to no contrast or luster in those pictures.

coinkat

I like the coin and the image. There appears to a whiteness captured in the image that makes this rare date Morgan all the more special. If the coin in hand looks as good as it does in the image, I am thinking 63+ with a 50% @ 64.

My opinion is heavily influenced by the image. It is a terrific coin and obviously worthy of sending off to our Host.

PTVETTER

What is the lusted like in hand

vplite99

I think a solid 64, from the photo.

124Spider

Impossible to say from the photos.

The level of chatter on the cheek could mean 64. But it also could mean 58.

Either way, it's a very nice coin!

logger7

coinkat

Attractive coin- congrats as you own a 95-O that looks significantly better than most.

MsMorrisine

gold bean

oldglorycoins

63 I'd crack it

Morgan13

That's definetly a coin worth cracking out. Its does not appear to be beat up using the images as an estimate.
It does not appear to have strong luster but that should impede the coin at this grade level.
Just looking at the pcgs price guide it has a $15k price jump from 62+ to 63.
I can easily see that coin in a 63 holder with pcgs.
Pretty lofty Morgan.

johnny9434

Thats a nice addition, id keep it as is

jfriedm56

Really nice quality! I’d PCGS it, then CAC.

Rampage

The coin looks better in the slab images. Nice coin and congrats on owning it...assuming you do.

coinkat

I would consider sending it to CAC as it is in an effort to get the gold. Both images lead me to think it is clearly worthy. In addition, there are the price spreads between grades. Even though I think it is likely under graded at 62+, there is minimal risk sending to CAC in the current holder. While TPG is tough on this date, this coin has an outstanding look based on the images. And if the coin looks that good in hand, I would argue that it compares very favorably to other examples graded at the 63 level. So by the direct submission to CAC, one retains the benefit of a +… even though it is at the 62 level.