Home World & Ancient Coins Forum

Please help identify 3 China cash

My neighbor has these 3 China cash coins. I've paged thru my Krause catalogues but no luck. I think I have the orientations correct; all are medal alignment. Thanks in advance.



Gene

Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors

Collector of:
Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
My Ebay

Comments

  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,834 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 18, 2026 6:10PM

    I've identified a few Chinese cash coins using this website:

    https://www.calgarycoin.com/reference/china/china8.htm#ching

  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,834 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 18, 2026 8:36PM

    Ok- I'll try.

    1: China Chien-lung 1736-95, KM391
    2: Not sure, but something says "Korea" to me
    3: Pictures too dark to tell

    Not much help, I'm sure, but I wasn't doing anything and gave it a shot.

  • SapyxSapyx Posts: 2,511 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Top: China, Qianlong emperor as noted by MasonG, Board of Works mint.
    Middle: Not China, but Japan. https://roberts.faculty.history.ucsb.edu/coins/Kaneibasics.html
    Bottom: China. It's a little hard to see but I'm pretty sure it's the Daoguang emperor (1820-1850), also Board of Works mint.

    Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one.
    Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"

    Apparently I have been awarded the DPOTD twice. B)
  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,834 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I missed it then, but it's still not China. ;)

  • 1960NYGiants1960NYGiants Posts: 3,588 ✭✭✭✭

    Thank you, both.

    Gene

    Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
    Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors

    Collector of:
    Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
    Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
    My Ebay
  • Sadly, I am bereft of references at the moment. Does anyone know what the 文 on the reverse of the Japanese coin is up to? A mint mark of some sort, perhaps?

  • SumnomesqueSumnomesque Posts: 4
    edited March 28, 2026 11:27PM

    Ok, so I remembered that the internet exists and that I am on it, so I looked up this bun 文 question. If the nicely written wiki page is to be believed, the bun 文 refers to the the Kanbun 寬文 Era. So, it's a date, not a mint mark, yes?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kan'ei_Tsūhō

  • SapyxSapyx Posts: 2,511 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is my understanding that it is both a mintmark - in the sense that only one mint (Kameido) used the "Bun" symbol - and the symbol was indeed derived from the Kanbun Era (1661–1673), although the "Bun" coins continued to be produced after the Kanbun era ended (the coins were made from 1668 to 1684), so it is perhaps more appropriate to consider it's use as a mintmark.

    The "Kanei" inscription (the two characters at top and bottom) was originally intended to be the era-date mark, in the same way as those two character positions are used for Chinese cash coins, because Kanei was the era-name in use in 1626 when the coinage began. But when the Kanei era ended in 1643, they just never updated the era-name and kept making coins with the Kanei inscription. Kanei means "eternally exquisite", so I guess they just liked the sentiment.

    Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one.
    Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, "Meditations"

    Apparently I have been awarded the DPOTD twice. B)
  • Thank you for the explanation. It makes sense.

    I found these images of a monument at the original mint site:

    https://otherjapan.com/places/kameido-coin-mint-remains

Sign In or Register to comment.