Interesting, but no real discoveries or insights in my view.
The left profile similarity was already known.
The recovery of the Judd-9a 1792 date from the density scan is cute, but no surprise that it matches the other coins made from that die. It feels like a "rich man's Nic-A-Date".
The speculation on the various scratched letters is rather pointless.
M and E for initials of Maria and Eckfeldt seems unlikely in my view.
Why would a person choose the first name of one person and the last name of the other for a "love token"?
Comments
Interesting, but no real discoveries or insights in my view.
The left profile similarity was already known.
The recovery of the Judd-9a 1792 date from the density scan is cute, but no surprise that it matches the other coins made from that die. It feels like a "rich man's Nic-A-Date".
The speculation on the various scratched letters is rather pointless.
M and E for initials of Maria and Eckfeldt seems unlikely in my view.
Why would a person choose the first name of one person and the last name of the other for a "love token"?
Link for better images of the patterns in the Donald Partrick collection sale:
https://coins.ha.com/itm/patterns/1792-p10c-silver-disme-judd-9-pollock-10-au50-ngc/a/1216-5507.s