Home U.S. Coin Forum

Guess the designations on these Franklin proof halves.

SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭✭

No peeking until after you guess.

1963

1

2

3

1962

1

2

3

1961

1

2

3

1960

1

2

3

Comments

  • Clackamas1Clackamas1 Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cam
    Cam
    DCam

    Dcam
    Cam
    Dcam

    Cam
    DCam
    Cam

    Dcam
    Dcam
    Dcam

  • MaywoodMaywood Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭✭✭

    C
    C
    DC

    C
    C
    C

    DC
    C
    C

    DC
    C
    DC

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    CAM
    CAM
    DCAM

    CAM
    PR
    DCAM

    PR
    PR
    PR

    CAM
    CAM
    DCAM

    Coin Photographer.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Anyone else want to venture a guess?

    Don’t be shy.

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 34,152 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 28, 2025 9:01PM

    it's late, the list is long, and i'm doing taxes this weekend :(

    last one - dcam beauty

    then after all the cam/dcam guesses, post that we all got it wrong because you wanted to know fbl or not

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • MaywoodMaywood Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 29, 2025 7:19AM

    It can be challenging to guess from images which were taken with the intent of accentuating the best qualities of the coin being imaged. That's not the same as "juiced" or "glamour shot" as some members like to use the terms. I think these images tend to show the best qualities of the coins but they don't necessarily show them as they truly are. It's like looking at a coin, rocking it in the light to see what it actually looks like, then viewing it at the angle which looks best. The graders saw every one of these coins in the good and bad light, saw every flaw and attribute. We only have one view.

    It reminds me of the "Seinfeld" episode where Jerry's girl friend look fabulous in the low light on their evening dates, not so much in the harsh light of the day. The best we can do is to try to mimic the PCGS grader lighting and then be overly harsh in our pre-submission assessment.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 29, 2025 9:29AM

    My thanks to those who have replied to this thread.

    The Grades/Designations for these 12 Franklins are:

    1963

    PF68
    PF67DCAM
    PF67CAM

    1962

    PF68CAM
    PF67
    PF68CAM

    1961

    PF67
    PF67
    PF67

    1960

    PF67CAM
    PF67CAM
    PF67DCAM

    The 12 coins, in hand under good lighting, appear as they do in the True View photos.

    Grading and Designations are truly a matter of subjective opinion. :)

    P.S. Flying Al was spot on with his guesses for the 1961 and 1960 coins.

  • CoinbertCoinbert Posts: 258 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just viewed my friends 14 piece date set this week. All of his coins are Cameo and Deep Cameo and CAC. On the Deep Cameo reverses the Liberty Bell appears to be floating in the air. I guess the same could be said for Benjamin Franklin too. Just my observation.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SanctionII - I've noticed PCGS can be a bit all over the place with these (2nd and 3rd 1963 should have the same designation).

    It's really just a guessing game sometimes, and you have to be lucky. Crack these all out and try again, and I'd bet a few trade holders.

    Coin Photographer.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Flying Al.

    I agree with you. Submitting raw cherrypicks for grading (beginning in 2021 and continuing through the present) has been very interesting.

    As for luck, the years 1959 and 1961 have been unlucky for me with respect to proof Franklins. Despite submitting multiple of these coins I have not yet made a Cameo example of either date. :'(

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file