New submission to our host.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cadd/1cadd05ea49f10b5e6fc63558fd7eb4094fae6c3" alt="SanctionII"
Today I sent to our host 16 coins dating from 1877 to 1962.
3 of the coins are already slabbed and they are unattributed FS varieties. I have requested that our host attribute them.
The other 13 coins are raw and include 10 FS varieties. I found these 13 slabbed and raw unattributed FS variety coins while looking through my collection.
These 10 raw coins I have requested that our host both grade and attribute. The other 3 raw coins are not varieties and have been submitted for grading only.
Should be interesting to see how this submission turns out.
Has anyone made a similar submission to our host? If so, how did it turn out for you?
1
Comments
I have not but will anxiously await you posting the results,
best of luck
boston
Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb
Bad transactions with : nobody to date
I don’t know how it works here, but ATS, asking for a previously unattributed variety is really a heavy lift.
I have. You have 2 submissions there. Raw with varieties and re-holder with varieties. When I did it, a couple varieties ended up being close but no cigar and given minor variety label.
I have also submitted raw economy to get grades and then deciding if the grade was high enough to warrant variety attribution. Having the FS- on the label does not always warrant the extra cost to get it. Doing it this way increases the cost even more with an extra reholder and share of shipping/invoice, but you already know the grade portion.