1932-S Washington Quarter Grading

DaRigMan04

Received this Raw 1932-S Quarter today. Had PVC contamination and had it dipped and looks much better. Looking to see if a coin like shown could get a low MS grade like 61 or 2? Most likely to send in to pcgs soon with the rest of my quarters. Got it for around $150 and I think it was worth it. Only issue I see is on the reverse there is a hit mark next to the eagle up top. Also hairlines on the obverse in the light.

TomB

It's AU.

relicsncoins

AU58

jfriedm56

AU58

291fifth

AU58

Maywood

Cleaned AU details.

MFeld

AU58

johnny9434

Au camp here, ok a 58 💪

DaRigMan04

@Maywood said:
Cleaned AU details.

cleaned? what makes you say that

clarkbar04

A true slider there.

Copperindian

AU58

DaRigMan04

It is a beautiful coin and I'm glad I snagged this one quickly when it was listed, well worth $150, I have a PCGS Au53 1932-S that looks far worse.

MFeld

AU58> @DaRigMan04 said:

@Maywood said:
Cleaned AU details.

cleaned? what makes you say that

I wondered the same thing and it appears that none of us who opined thought the coin was “cleaned”.

DaRigMan04

@MFeld said:
AU58> @DaRigMan04 said:

@Maywood said:
Cleaned AU details.

cleaned? what makes you say that

I wondered the same thing and it appears that none of us who opined thought the coin was “cleaned”.

I don't see anything on the coin besides for hairlines on the obverse from usage to say it was "cleaned"

oreville

Pretty AU-58.

MICHAELDIXON

AU58

VanHalen

AU55

coastaljerseyguy

Appears MA and a great looking AU+ coin, but the OP said it was dipped to removed PVC, so technically it was cleaned in the broadest sense.

jmlanzaf

@MFeld said:
AU58> @DaRigMan04 said:

@Maywood said:
Cleaned AU details.

cleaned? what makes you say that

I wondered the same thing and it appears that none of us who opined thought the coin was “cleaned”.

The OP mentioned a dip and there is a spot on the left of the obverse. He also mentioned "hairlines " in the light. The photo doesn't look cleaned, however.

Cougar1978

AU 58

Maywood

Thank you, @jmlanzaf.

I was going to do a cut/paste of the things you mentioned, but what's the use. I have learned it's usually easier to just make my comment and move on. Feld seems to want to criticize much of what I post which is why he's on the "Ignore" list.

MFeld

jmlanzaf Posts: 35,140 ✭✭✭✭✭February 12, 2025 6:56AM
@MFeld said:
AU58> @DaRigMan04 said:

» show previous quotes
I wondered the same thing and it appears that none of us who opined thought the coin was “cleaned”.

The OP mentioned a dip and there is a spot on the left of the obverse. He also mentioned "hairlines " in the light. The photo doesn't look cleaned, however.

@Maywood said:
Thank you, @jmlanzaf.

I was going to do a cut/paste of the things you mentioned, but what's the use. I have learned it's usually easier to just make my comment and move on. Feld seems to want to criticize much of what I post which is why he's on the "Ignore" list.

>

Thank you from me, too, @jmlanzaf. Yes, I had seen what the OP mentioned. Yet the coin didn't appear to be cleaned in the sense that it would be so-designated and given a details grade. It's too bad that @Maywood wasn't able to just make his comment and move on.