Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Would NGC have been accurate stating "Added Mintmark" vs "Altered Mintmark"?

braddickbraddick Posts: 24,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum


peacockcoins

Comments

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,945 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Added mintmark would be a more accurate description.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I also wouldn't identify it as a 1909-S VDB.

    I'd state on the insert, 1909 VDB
    Added mintmark.

    peacockcoins

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 24,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't think it would have sold for as much as it did had NGC done so.
    https://www.ebay.com/itm/396039750595

    peacockcoins

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,903 ✭✭✭✭✭

    “Altered mint mark” as a category covers removed mint marks as well.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,424 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 25, 2024 10:48AM

    Altered mint mark to the casual implies that there is an existing mint mark.

  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,132 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely an added mintmark. The “deep N” in UNITED confirms it is a 1909 VDB, worth 35 cents not $350

    *For Sale on Numismy* *For Sale on Ebay*

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...