Looks like from the one photo only - a struck-through very late stage capped die.
Would like to see the reverse side too….
Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
Thanks for posting that – yes,it’s struck through a late stage die cap.
Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
I would consider it an early to mid-stage struck through die cap error, not late stage. Usually, I’d like to see a lot more obverse details to call it a late stage struck through die cap error. Those die caps really got thin and let quite a bit of the obverse die detail to bleed through, and there’s just not much obverse design to be seen on this coin.
@MarkKelley , thanks for the tip on the one year 1973 reverse, didn't know about that. Although, looks like the top of the F should align with the building corner based on what I'm seeing on VarietyVista and TrueViews....but your intel does help narrow the date to 1974-1982 based on reverse and copper composition (3.1g).
Comments
I have an idea, but might you have images of the reverse side, as well.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
A "very nice!" type?
As a first guess I'd say it's struck through a capped die.
Is the inner rim as rounded as it looks in the picture? Can you post pics of the reverse and ideally the edge also?
I agree w/ Jonathanb-
Looks like from the one photo only - a struck-through very late stage capped die.
Would like to see the reverse side too….
Here's the reverse:
Thanks for posting that – yes,it’s struck through a late stage die cap.
Capped die strike is correct. And FYI, the date is 1973. It's the only year the designer's initials were this large.
I would consider it an early to mid-stage struck through die cap error, not late stage. Usually, I’d like to see a lot more obverse details to call it a late stage struck through die cap error. Those die caps really got thin and let quite a bit of the obverse die detail to bleed through, and there’s just not much obverse design to be seen on this coin.
Thanks everyone!
@MarkKelley , thanks for the tip on the one year 1973 reverse, didn't know about that. Although, looks like the top of the F should align with the building corner based on what I'm seeing on VarietyVista and TrueViews....but your intel does help narrow the date to 1974-1982 based on reverse and copper composition (3.1g).