Home U.S. Coin Forum

1982 d small date zinc Lincoln cent

I read there was a new error found on the 1982 Philadelphia, small date, zinc, Lincoln cent, reverse. But what about the 1982 Denver small date zinc Lincoln cent. I compared the Philadelphia with the Denver and the Denver has some characteristics of the Philadelphia. The doubling in the letters on the reverse has the same characteristics, namely the e in one and the e in cent. E pluribus unum looks a lot funny too. Hope my pictures are good enough. Thank you in advance posting some coins









Tagged:

Comments

  • jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 3,563 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Did you post the right pictures? I see no signs of doubling in anything that you posted.

  • Hi Jonathan yeah I posted the right one 1982 d small date zinc Lincoln cent. The reverse has the same characteristics as the 82 Philadelphia reversed especially the e like I said in one and cent.

    Here's the pictures I was going off. The e on the reverse sure looks like the one from Philadelphia or am I going crazy

  • IkesTIkesT Posts: 3,094 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 10, 2024 7:46PM

    @Menza said:
    The e on the reverse sure looks like the one from Philadelphia or am I going crazy

    You said it! :D

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,249 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Menza said:
    Here's the pictures I was going off. The e on the reverse sure looks like the one from Philadelphia or am I going crazy

    Your coin looks nothing like the coin posted on the coppercoins site, zero in common.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • percybpercyb Posts: 3,322 ✭✭✭✭

    There doesn’t appear to be a doubling of the E on your coin.

    "Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world." PBShelley

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file