@Manifest_Destiny said:
This is the correct, and only mint mark position. The fake above has an 1876-78 mint mark style.
This reverse die was used here and for one die marriage for 1876……………. Very rare and distinct.
Not for the 73-cc arrows. The one you're referring to was the 73-cc N/A and 76 reverse die. The die above, which is very similar, was used on all 70-73-cc quarters except the 73 N/A
Comments
You're pretty sharp , but others aren't it's a good thing we can pick them off.
Yeah, those mint mark shapes are way too tall.
This is the correct, and only mint mark position. The fake above has an 1876-78 mint mark style.
This reverse die was used here and for one die marriage for 1876……………. Very rare and distinct.
Not for the 73-cc arrows. The one you're referring to was the 73-cc N/A and 76 reverse die. The die above, which is very similar, was used on all 70-73-cc quarters except the 73 N/A
Reported.
Reported and seller messaged.
eBay actually removed the listing.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
In addition to being fake, it is also in violation of eBay's policy for ungraded coins:
"Must have a starting, reserve, or Buy It Now price of less than $2,500"