Morgan Dollar, would this qualify as rim damage? Detail?

Joe_360

Would this damage make this Morgan ungradable? Thanks for your input.

jmlanzaf

Probably not

PapiNE

I had one come back details "rim damage" that is barely seen from the front. However, the damage (a slit) crossed over to each side. I'm not sure how yours would be treated.

LeeBone

I would think, and hope, not.

may

Low grade coins (especially heavy ones) are expected to have some small rim bumps.

johnny9434

I don't see to much that would prevent it from grading, jmo

Note: a full Pic would help w/reverse 🙂

jeffas1974

FWIW, this 89 CC that I sent in came back with a "rim damage" details label.

AUandAG

The rim damage, at 4:00, appears to be severe enough to get a details, genuine grade. The damage goes beyond the rim and into the dentils.
bob
PS: nice coin for sure even with the rim problem.

FrankH

@AUandAG said:
The rim damage, at 4:00, appears to be severe enough to get a details, genuine grade. The damage goes beyond the rim and into the dentils.
bob
PS: nice coin for sure even with the rim problem.

@AUandAG said:
The rim damage, at 4:00, appears to be severe enough to get a details, genuine grade. The damage goes beyond the rim and into the dentils.
bob
PS: nice coin for sure even with the rim problem.

Key dates seem to attract closer scrutiny. While I too like that coin, simply the word, "DETAIL" would remove it from my consideration.
Fair and sensible? No, but that's the way it is.

johnny9434

its still a very decent coin, i like. best wishes on the admission if gone that way

coastaljerseyguy

Wonder if the TPG's make a differentiation between a rim ding/gauge and a rim bump that effects the circular look of the coin, and whether the coin gets a clean vs details grade. Although we haven't seen the OP coin in full view, looks like it does not have the same rim effect as the 89CC. Also agree the key dates will get a closer scrutiny.