@RobertScotLover said:
Redfield had a huge silver dollar Las Vegas gambling casino hoard, that much was known, but show me the chain of title proving it was his dollar. As far as I know there is zero photographic to prove it imo which is why I would never buy a Redfield anything as opposed to other pedigrees that are backed up with original source documentation
In this case, the "original source documentation" is the red holder that Redfield dollars were marketed in. My guess is that the pedigree came from a PCGS submitter including the 1924-S in its original Paramount holder.
My point is just because it is in a so-called Refield holder doesn't prove anything. He had 1000's of dollars, with what kind of controls. Why couldn't the dealer who bought all and presumably hollered them put more in the mix, who would know?
Does it really matter 40 years later? The market has made its decision.
Wow tough crowd as usual. Disputing Redfield provenance, whether it or any pedigree adds any value, the PCGS grade based on photo or whether CAC would sticker, and my coin is better. I hope the new owner enjoys the coin. Looks very nice. Would love to see in hand.
Comments
Does it really matter 40 years later? The market has made its decision.
Wow tough crowd as usual. Disputing Redfield provenance, whether it or any pedigree adds any value, the PCGS grade based on photo or whether CAC would sticker, and my coin is better. I hope the new owner enjoys the coin. Looks very nice. Would love to see in hand.