Home U.S. Coin Forum

What one feasible change/improvement would you like to see the major grading companies make?

MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,418 ✭✭✭✭✭

?

Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

«134

Comments

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,235 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Abandon the numbers and go to words only to describe the coin.

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

  • gtstanggtstang Posts: 1,744 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As far as PCGS goes, I think they could raise grading costs slightly and get rid of charging membership fees.
    I've seen a lot of posts over the years where folks forget about those vouchers because they expire.

  • TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 174 ✭✭✭

    Stop guessing when it comes to strike type. The mint used the same dies for some coins when striking both proof and business strikes. In well circulated condition there is often no definitive way to tell which is which.

    If they are going to call a coin that falls into this category PR12, either post an article/info page defining their policy regarding decisions on coins like this or return the coin to the submitter "no decision - strike type can not be determined".

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,418 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mr1931S said:
    Abandon the numbers and go to words only to describe the coin.

    By "feasible" I meant something the grading companies could and might do.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 27, 2024 6:09AM

    Be more elaborate in their slab designs, such as adding some vines or flowers or flags or even random shapes. The standard labels gets boring over time.

    P.S. This is my 1000th post!

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • lermishlermish Posts: 2,866 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CRHer700 said:
    Also, moving out of California might be a good business idea for PCGS.

    I just received coins back the day after they were shipped and got a package there next day with normal shipping. Please no :)

  • jomjom Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Do something to rectify the discrepancy in value between really nice high-end AU and crappy lower mint state coins. Something descriptive like AU63 or some such.

    jom

  • hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,090 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CRHer700 said:
    Also, moving out of California might be a good business idea for PCGS.

    An alternative would be to branch out, preferably adding a Midwest location and an East Coast location.

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • oldabeintxoldabeintx Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Slab contemporary counterfeit half pennys. Absurd to slab Machin’s Mills counterfeits and not others. Also, stop straight-grading ED and damaged early copper.

  • oldabeintxoldabeintx Posts: 1,897 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oops that’s two. So “improve treatment of early coppers”.

  • Jacques_LoungecoqueJacques_Loungecoque Posts: 733 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I know I’ll probably get flamed for this, but I think it’s time to go to a 100 point scale.

    If I may steal another: I’d like to see them improve turnaround times. Perhaps do a better job of creating a grader pipeline to fill those spots?

    And one more cuz I’m greedy: STOP factoring toning into grades!

    Having fun while switching things up and focusing on a next level PCGS slabbed 1950+ type set, while still looking for great examples for the 7070.

  • ProofmorganProofmorgan Posts: 756 ✭✭✭✭✭

    PSA (Collectible Card Grading), has just released that they'll publish grader notes to the submitter (only) for their highest tiers (Rarity/Walkthrough). I hope that the coin TPGs follow.

    Collector of Original Early Gold with beginnings in Proof Morgan collecting.
  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,356 ✭✭✭✭✭

    First one in, first one out.


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 33,932 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Abandon the numbers and go to words only to describe the coin.

    By "feasible" I meant something the grading companies could and might do.

    You don't want a thousand word essay stapled to your coin slab?

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 33,932 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jom said:
    Do something to rectify the discrepancy in value between really nice high-end AU and crappy lower mint state coins. Something descriptive like AU63 or some such.

    jom

    AU63????

    Why not F45 or VG50?

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,499 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Collector coins especially gold to the front of the line, bullion to the back.

  • jacrispiesjacrispies Posts: 899 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jom said:
    Do something to rectify the discrepancy in value between really nice high-end AU and crappy lower mint state coins. Something descriptive like AU63 or some such.

    jom

    I think that all grading companies should grade their coins accurately and call them all AU-58!!!

    "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
    BHNC #AN-10
    JRCS #1606

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,263 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 27, 2024 8:00AM

    I want to see less (no) market grading, it is well past time to stop ignoring rub and grading what are obvious AU's as MS.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • jomjom Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @jom said:
    Do something to rectify the discrepancy in value between really nice high-end AU and crappy lower mint state coins. Something descriptive like AU63 or some such.

    jom

    AU63????

    Why not F45 or VG50?

    What you call it is irrelevant. Everyone knows many AU coins are nicer and hence worth MORE than many MS graded coins. The grading system should reflect that. To me it's arbitrary to make a coin worth a lot less (in terms of the numerical grading system anyway) just due to a little bit of wear. Wear is just another attribute to a coin like strike, bag marks and luster.

    @jacrispies said:

    @jom said:
    Do something to rectify the discrepancy in value between really nice high-end AU and crappy lower mint state coins. Something descriptive like AU63 or some such.

    I think that all grading companies should grade their coins accurately and call them all AU-58!!!

    It's supposedly accurate according to the so-called grading system we have now. But in terms of value in many cases it's way off. Frankly, this may very well be fault of the "numerical" grading system we are stuck with and so it may not be a "feasible" change as suggested by Mark.

    jom

  • ShurkeShurke Posts: 345 ✭✭✭✭

    I’d like to see strike designations—e.g. Full Bands, Full Head, etc.—applied to circulated coins when appropriate. Many AU coins would qualify.

    As others have mentioned, I’d also like to see general improvements made to variety attribution.

  • bretsanbretsan Posts: 171 ✭✭✭

    I would like to see PCGS match pricing with CACG. For Morgan and Peace dollars valued below $500 it's only $15 for grading. Most coins over $500 in value are $35 to grade.

  • goodmoney4badmoneygoodmoney4badmoney Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Turnaround times

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 3,700 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Shurke said:
    I’d like to see strike designations—e.g. Full Bands, Full Head, etc.—applied to circulated coins when appropriate. Many AU coins would qualify.

    As others have mentioned, I’d also like to see general improvements made to variety attribution.

    I think they will designate some of those at the AU58 level if I'm not mistaken. At least FH on SLQs can be attributed in AU58.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A 1-10 scale on eye appeal.

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 28,281 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @jom said:
    Do something to rectify the discrepancy in value between really nice high-end AU and crappy lower mint state coins. Something descriptive like AU63 or some such.

    jom

    AU63????

    Why not F45 or VG50?

    with a ag 55 on slab to boot

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,946 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OAKSTAR said:
    Cut "ALL" business ties to Communist China! Any questions??

    :|

    peacockcoins

  • alefzeroalefzero Posts: 967 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Another is the degradation of a planchet issue as an ungradable problem. As minted is as minted. A planchet flaw is a matter of aesthetics, for better or worse. An XF and an XF Details for a split planchet are both simply XF.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,235 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Abandon the numbers and go to words only to describe the coin.

    By "feasible" I meant something the grading companies could and might do.

    I suppose you are right. So many out there hooked on numbers, the outrage would be tremendous.

    Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 9,969 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Instead if wrecking the current system with an AU63 grade for MS coins with a slight MS disqualifying factor, such as a slight rub, why not simply give the AU grade a "+". Very few AU58 coins have a "+", yet many are far more attractive than MS60-63. So perhaps CHD has an answer for eye appeal. These ideas while stirring much debate still have credibility worthy of consideration.
    I do not think the system requires a complete overhaul, such as 1-100, but could be tweaked to make a grade more acceptable without seeing the coin. Then it gives a buyer more reason to wish to further investigate the coin's viewing before purchase.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • seatedlib3991seatedlib3991 Posts: 700 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If I could force one change it would be this. I would force them to hermetically seal all coins.
    It is my understanding that this step towards permanent protection allready exists. It is just nor done. James

  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,142 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @jom said:
    Do something to rectify the discrepancy in value between really nice high-end AU and crappy lower mint state coins. Something descriptive like AU63 or some such.

    jom

    AU63????

    Why not F45 or VG50?

    Because AU58 is a unique case. No matter how fabulous a coin may be as far as lustre, strike, eye appeal, etc., if it has any hint of rub, it should be graded AU. Where there are 11 mint state grades, there is only one grade for a coin that has a minor rub (more wear and you start moving down to 55, 53...). As such, AU58 coins can easily be more appealing than many (particularly low-end) mint state pieces, and may largely appear similar to a mid or higher mint state grade, except for the rub.

    Since coins grading lower than 58 can move up or down in grade based on amount of wear, there's no need for new classifications; XF and 45 go together. You can rename 45 to F, but it's still a 45. Less wear than a 45 and it should be a 50. More wear and it should be a 40. AU58 is the only grade where more numbers could provide additional value.

    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 13,418 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @airplanenut said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @jom said:
    Do something to rectify the discrepancy in value between really nice high-end AU and crappy lower mint state coins. Something descriptive like AU63 or some such.

    jom

    AU63????

    Why not F45 or VG50?

    Because AU58 is a unique case. No matter how fabulous a coin may be as far as lustre, strike, eye appeal, etc., if it has any hint of rub, it should be graded AU. Where there are 11 mint state grades, there is only one grade for a coin that has a minor rub (more wear and you start moving down to 55, 53...). As such, AU58 coins can easily be more appealing than many (particularly low-end) mint state pieces, and may largely appear similar to a mid or higher mint state grade, except for the rub.

    >

    Jeremy, I think one could reasonably substitute AU55 for AU58 in each instance you mentioned it in your above paragraph.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,049 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Only kidding, only kidding!

    Don't get your panties in a knot. 🤣 😂

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,142 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @airplanenut said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @jom said:
    Do something to rectify the discrepancy in value between really nice high-end AU and crappy lower mint state coins. Something descriptive like AU63 or some such.

    jom

    AU63????

    Why not F45 or VG50?

    Because AU58 is a unique case. No matter how fabulous a coin may be as far as lustre, strike, eye appeal, etc., if it has any hint of rub, it should be graded AU. Where there are 11 mint state grades, there is only one grade for a coin that has a minor rub (more wear and you start moving down to 55, 53...). As such, AU58 coins can easily be more appealing than many (particularly low-end) mint state pieces, and may largely appear similar to a mid or higher mint state grade, except for the rub.

    >

    Jeremy, I think one could reasonably substitute AU55 for AU58 in each instance you mentioned it in your above paragraph.

    Fair enough. What I'm hearing is AU58 and AU55 should have two grades, the AU number to indicate wear, and the MS number to indicate what the grade would be without wear. So then we could argue about who would rather have an AU58(64) versus an AU55(65).

    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,067 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Something I have suggested for decades... an original surfaces designation. And it has been discussed here in the past. And given how TPG and sticker approval services unfolded, it seems harder to secure the barn gate... The concept was a lost opportunity to best protect a small and diminishing class of original coins from unnecessary enhancement that has ultimately created a class of second tier of coins that are just simply tough to look at and even tougher to accept.

    Save your fingers Mark- I know it is not going happen.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file