Could this be considered machine doubling?
collectormel7
Posts: 110 ✭✭
Because of this the signature has been repositioned.
I know PCGS now grades these varieties.
PCGS Recognizes and Discovers New Chinese Varieties
https://www.pcgs.com/news/pcgs-recognizes-and-discovers-new-chinese-varieties
This thread is only for the signature only.
What garlic is to salad, insanity is to art. (Augustus Saint-Gaudens)
0
Comments
Yes. It could also be die deterioration.
Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors
Collector of:
Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
My Ebay
It seems more machined then deterioration. But I needed a little knowledge from the experts.
The error seemed to have shifted the signature. Can you tell me if there is a refernce I can find online or in a book for the distance and postion of the signature of these coins?
I’m not seeing anything significant here. It does appear to have some degradation or machine-doubling going on, but nothing that would indicate a major or minor variety of any kind. I don’t see any value-added errors. Sorry. I’m just not seeing anything worthwhile. All the ones PCGS is now recognizing in that article are doubled dies. These don’t look like double dies, even more significant is that you have two of them and the apparent doubling is different on each one. This gives additional evidence that it’s not a variety, but elements that happened because of the strike itself (machine doubling.)
I'm BACK!!! Used to be Billet7 on the old forum.
@SimonW
Shame on all of you
@Simon W
And this is the same coin
Not two different coins. The same. Shot at different angles and lightling was also different.
Sorry, my mistake, it appeared quite different from the lighting difference, even the strike looks weaker near the bottom of the letters. It doesn’t change my opinion though.
I'm BACK!!! Used to be Billet7 on the old forum.
@Simon W
Can you recommend a good camera for taking images of coins? With macro lens?
I think that it's die deterioration, not any important doubling. It's a spender.
@ Syl
Why call my coin invaluable (spender)
It is not modern or non collectible like the silver fakes circulation online.
What makes it a spender?
Is this the same counterfeit coin that you posted multiple times last October?
If it is then it does not matter if it is a Doubled Die or Machine Doubling.
No it is not a counterfiet just bad images.
@Greenstang
Not fake just very poorly shot images. Please be kind.
Seems on this thread and forum my images are streched and enlarge and this makes already bad images look worse.
Please have fun and not be so hardcore. Collecting is about money and there is a very high level of fraud in the world. But it is supposed to be fun. Let us be kind to eachother and just have fun collecting.
And it is very poor images this coin is very authentic.