Home U.S. Coin Forum

just a topic for my coin photos. Opinions appreciated.

johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭
edited August 11, 2024 11:56AM in U.S. Coin Forum

As stated by the title, I need opinions in regard to my ability to take photos. Such as what I should improve on (e.g. Lighting, Distance, angle of camera) I'll add the spec's of my set-up later so I do apologize for that. Now back to the photos, I did what I could to make the photos match the coins without editing them. But they just don't look right to me and I don't know why?. So here are the photos I took with my current set-up. Part 1




Here is the Buffalos TrueView

«1

Comments

  • 1960NYGiants1960NYGiants Posts: 3,482 ✭✭✭✭

    They look out of focus to me. Could be the micro focus ability of your setup or a washing out affect of the light source.

    Gene

    Life member #369 of the Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
    Member of Canadian Association of Token Collectors

    Collector of:
    Canadian coins and pre-confederation tokens
    Darkside proof/mint sets dated 1960
    My Ebay
  • Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They aren’t bad photos, probably just need to tweak the lighting to see improvement. Shooting through slabs is tough. The focusing might be focusing on the slabs and not the coins surface. You can try the oil drops trick to make the slab invisible maybe.

    Mr_Spud

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    Thank y'all for the responses😊. I suspected that it was a problem with focusing/lighting. The background info about that ("that" being the photos lack of focus) is because I don't have a stand for it and as a result I free hand my photos. When it comes to the lighting. I do mess with them (I use two lights) as the position of the lights for a bigger coin (such as a Morgan Dollar) likely won't work with smaller coins (e.g. a Cent or Dime). Oh, and @Mr_Spud what is the oil drop trick?

  • BodinBodin Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭

    What kind of lights? You are on the right track!

  • Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Oh, and @Mr_Spud what is the oil drop trick?

    It’s a way to make slab scuffs and even glare invisible to the camera lens. You put a couple of drops of oil on the slab right over where the coin is and it makes the slab invisible. Some use mineral oil, some use WD-40, I use optically clear compass oil that slowly evaporates so it’s easier to wipe off and then just let any residue evaporate.

    Heres one of the threads about it with pictures
    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/1094423/mineral-oil-for-coin-slab-photos-before-n-after

    Mr_Spud

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 21, 2024 9:39AM

    Their not the worst images I've ever seen but if your seeking perfection some kind of stand will help you out.
    I have a small inexpensive table stand. I can take images through the slabs not a problem by diffusing the lights to eliminate glare.
    I still don't think I take perfect images but I have got myself to tye point they are acceptable to me.
    Good luck and don't give up.
    Purchased mine from ebay. Kaiser copy stand. Decent quality for the money.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan

  • DelawareDoonsDelawareDoons Posts: 3,413 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 21, 2024 9:05AM

    Decent. Especially for freehand. Buy a nice copy stand, it makes a HUGE difference and combined with tethering to a laptop makes it about 10x easier to shoot too.

    "It's like God, Family, Country, except Sticker, Plastic, Coin."

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,468 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Better than 90% of eBay sellers.
    Get yourself a stand, or at least a tripod that can straddle the corner of a desk and shoot straight down, this is what I use but I'm also no professional. Software for remote shooting is a must and makes like a lot easier. Check your camera manufacturer's website.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • spyglassdesignspyglassdesign Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 21, 2024 3:25PM

    You definitely need some kind of stand, custom or premade. The main issue I see is lighting and clarity. Your Morgans look pretty darn good though! A little editing of contrast with photoshop or similar will help a lot IMO... once you fix the focus, that may solve most of your issues though. They really are great pictures for freehand!!! And, as mentioned by others, better than most on the likes of eBay and similar.

    I use this with my Camera (Canon t8i)... you didn't mention what kind of camera you use. If you are using a phone, you can retrofit a bracket, or find a mount for the phone or camera. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B094N6W6SP/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o09_s02?ie=UTF8&th=1 (EDIT I forgot this mount actually has a phone mount included!) If you use a camera that can connect to a PC, you may be able to use something like the Canon software to zoom in and check zoom and take the pictures from your pc directly? As I said, I don't know what kind of camera you are using.

    I also use 2 LED adjustable lights, generally at 2 and 10 give or take, depending on the coin... some need slightly different locations. A lot of people here like to use different types of lights... I find the inexpensive LED's to work just fine for me.

    All in all, you are in a great place, with just a little improvement your images can really pop.

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭
    edited June 1, 2024 5:33PM

    Thank you @spyglassdesign for the link and I do apologize for dropping the ball when it came to the camera I use (I use a Panasonic DMC-TS3). So, the stand should work, I'll post some photos of the results once I get it and set it up.

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 19,931 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Considering your equipment, they're quite good. The camera's lens being on the corner of the camera is actually keeping the camera out of the way of the lights, but the relatively short focal length means you're going to get glare easier and probably have a short working distance, both of which mean a low light angle and dark areas on lustrous coins. Lights are fine, but I'd use a narrower reflector. For the buffalo nickel, I imagine the truth is somewhere between your picture and the TV. See if the camera lets you increase the exposure a bit. Polish the slab to remove scratches and/or smear a tiny amount of oil on the scratched area to make it disappear for the photo.

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,754 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I just use whatever the wife has in the kitchen oil cabinet. NOT olive oil. Canola, etc, will work great to get rid of slab picture problems. Just wipes off with a kleenex, etc.

    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    I won't have the stand until tomorrow but I wanted to test my photographing and mess with some settings and these are the results. this first photo is purely and wholly a glamour shot. I just took the photo to show the colors of the toning but the coin does not have anywhere near the reflectivity and contrast shown in fact the whole coin has a faint white fog over it (which can slightly be seen on the obverse in front of liberty in the 2nd photo).

    Another thing I did was mess with the photos size (not the greatest thing to do) after which I found that the 1st photo is slightly hazy compared to the 2nd photo. So, I checked the file size and found that I didn't reduces it (the first photo is about 10MB while the 2nd is 5MB which is still very large to me) and do to the fact the photos are slightly compressed more by this wonderful site it makes the blurriness more noticeable (and I don't want this to come off as something I dislike, as I genuinely appreciate not having my whole screen taken up by a single large photo). I do apologize for this long winded post 😅,opinions are appreciated and thank y'all for the comments,
    1.

    2.

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    I got the stand in the mail a few days ago and did some testing. Here are some of the photos I took use the stand and I will add more after I edit them in to duel photos. As always opinions are appreciated



  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    Here are some more raw coin photos :) The first two photos are GSAs



  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭
    edited June 10, 2024 12:00AM

    I am still getting used to the new setup😅 . Here are the photos so far.




  • spyglassdesignspyglassdesign Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnhenry9009 fabulous. Sharpness and focus looks good. Lighting looks good. I'd expect that's what I'd get if I got any of them in hand! Looking really good!

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    Thank you @spyglassdesign and here some more photos.




  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    How do these photos look? (Still getting used to the new set up :smiley: )



  • spyglassdesignspyglassdesign Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnhenry9009 only thing I can think of at the moment is to try to light up the buff a bit more maybe, if you can. Feels a little dull compared to the others imo. Might be able to just tinker with the camera settings a little for the buff. The rest look great imo.

    One thing I like to do at this point is copy just the coin onto a white background for consistency using a photo editor.

  • ajaanajaan Posts: 17,356 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The photos look good. The real question is how do the photos compare to the coins in hand.


    DPOTD-3
    'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'

    CU #3245 B.N.A. #428


    Don
  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    Here is another one and I did my best to show the toning which is most accurate in the 1st photo, as I did increase the brightness for the obverse in 2nd photo by a little to much so the toning less dark then it really is.

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

  • emeraldATVemeraldATV Posts: 4,543 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1960NYGiants said:
    They look out of focus to me. Could be the micro focus ability of your setup or a washing out affect of the light source.

    Maybe it's just me.
    Cut out the coin and place in a darker back round. Don't worry about the prongs.
    A short cut of focus , a temp fix, would be the size presented. Just a ted off.
    Every coin has it's own, show off way, to photograph its true details.

  • DCWDCW Posts: 7,258 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 4, 2024 2:03PM

    Overall, they look pretty good. But, they're coming across a bit dark in my end. Play with the lighting a little or tweak the exposure?

    Dead Cat Waltz Exonumia
    "Coin collecting for outcasts..."

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    If you use a computer and would like a closer view of the photos you can hover over the image and then "right click" and ether click on "Open image in new tab " or go down and click on "Magnify Image"
    Here are some more photos and I was (almost) able to get the buff to look as it does in hand but there is some shade at 11 -1 on the Obv. (I think that is from me only being able to use two lights instead of three due to limited free space) but the color of the toning is close to what it is in hand. I believe that I also made three of the four coin photos too small when I put them in the photoshop I use for the layering with the buff, Cail. Frac, and the 21 Morgan being victims of it.

    For the Cail. frac. this is more then likely the best photo I can do for now. But somethings could have made it look better: Like using oil to cover up the very noticeable scratches on the Rev. which are on the holder and not the coin. Another thing that is hard to get is the almost PL surface it has. I could have not reduce as much. So, it is not as much of a strain on the eyes. But, hey, you live and you learn.

    On to this one, I'd say this is the only coin I got the proportions at least half way decent, It's still not great but it's better. I almost have morgan dollars to the level (In terms of lighting) where very little of the coin is dark or has a hidden mark. Oh and this Morgan is in a Gen. 3 NGC holder and it looks more like a 65 to me

    Lastly this one was hard to photograph as to has what I'd call semi-PL fields and for $40 I couldn't pass on it. But back on subject the slight blueish hue is from my camera (being a blue Panasonic DMC-TS3), Sadly what can't really be seen (except at 1:30-2:00 and 9:00-9:30) on the Obv. is that it has some heavy finger prints which are toning (I wouldn't be surprised if it's unattractive toning) but time will tell as I don't plan on cracking it out.

  • erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,065 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Images are definitely improving! Way better than anything I can do!

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    Here are some more




  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,038 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You might want to talk to @in2Coins

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OAKSTAR said:
    You might want to talk to @in2Coins

    How in the world did he get such close ups?

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • OAKSTAROAKSTAR Posts: 7,038 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You're asking the wrong guy @CRHer700. You need to ask @in2Coins. Looks like some type of Scanning Electron Microscope.

    Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )

  • robecrobec Posts: 6,745 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OAKSTAR said:
    You're asking the wrong guy @CRHer700. You need to ask @in2Coins. Looks like some type of Scanning Electron Microscope.

    Those photos look like the results of the microscope coin photo systems @rmpsrpms puts together.

  • in2Coinsin2Coins Posts: 352 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 6, 2024 2:30PM

    @OAKSTAR said:
    You're asking the wrong guy @CRHer700. You need to ask @in2Coins. Looks like some type of Scanning Electron Microscope.

    I don’t want to hijack the OP’s great photography work post but the pics are stacked with just a high mag lens. I have put together some rigs that I use for these photos.

    @OAKSTAR thanks for the compliment! ✌🏻

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    @in2Coins
    I don't mind if this topic is "hijacked," but when it comes to your photography (and answering questions about it), I believe it deserves its own topic, as it would most likely just get lost if it were posted in this relatively out of the way topic, and I am sure more than a few fellow members (such as myself) are interested in how you take your photos and edit them and would like to know how you do it, as your close-ups and full coin photos are stunning.

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭




  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭
    edited July 7, 2024 2:12PM

    Thanks for the response @in2Coins, I did some tinkering to see if that would help fix the blurriness, when it comes to my camera's settings, I don't really want to mess with them unless I need/want to (I like to procrastinate 🤣) but I think I solved a different problem I was having. As my DSLR is a blue one (that I got for 25 bucks at a garage sale) you can see the refection of it in a fairly unreflective coin (such as in the Peace dollar below)

    and the blueish hue is even more noticeable in a Proof or Proof like coin as shown in the below raw Morgan dollar (which I think could be PL)

    But as stated before I believe I was able to solve this by using some good ol' black electrical tape to cover up most of the visible blue on the front of the DSLR. Here is the result.

    to finish up my reply, I understand that if I were to mess with the brightness/ISO or exposure it would help me out but I personally dislike any postproduction that may make my coin better than it is in person. (this is for my own setup)
    And here's a new photo of the PCGS Rattler 1921 Morgan (the Obverse is slightly blurry but i'll need to get some Mineral oil or car headlight cleaner for the slab)

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭



  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭
    edited July 10, 2024 4:12PM




    (Edit to say these photos are trash )

  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    here are some updated photos


  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭





  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭

    non-edited photos




  • johnhenry9009johnhenry9009 Posts: 167 ✭✭✭









  • Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The pictures keep getting better and better as I just scanned through this entire thread 👍🏼

    Mr_Spud

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file