Some new grades from NGC

AlanSki

Both 38 D/D’s (RPM-2) were soapbox 65’s. The 1913 T1 was a one line fatty 65. The 37-S was in a cleaned slab. The 1936 and 41 were both 65’s. Everything else stayed the same.

All were cracked out before being subbed.

braddick

Nice results.
Congratulations.
If you don't mind me asking- what was your turn-around time?

AlanSki

@braddick said:
Nice results.
Congratulations.
If you don't mind me asking- what was your turn-around time?

I had a friend sub them for me at the Dallas show. Took them 4 days.

braddick

That is impressive, along with you results.

RobertScotLover

Did you send the cleaned '37-s in the cleaned designated slabbed or raw?

braddick

@RobertScotLover said:
Did you send the cleaned '37-s in the cleaned designated slabbed or raw?

"All were cracked out before being subbed."

RobertScotLover

@braddick said:

@RobertScotLover said:
Did you send the cleaned '37-s in the cleaned designated slabbed or raw?

"All were cracked out before being subbed."

thanks , missed the last sentence

messydesk

So looking at the group of 10 now, do the grades make more or less sense than they did before?

AlanSki

@messydesk said:
So looking at the group of 10 now, do the grades make more or less sense than they did before?

They make more sense now. All the slabs were old holders that have been in my family since the early 90’s with the exception of the 67 D/D which was bought on eBay last year.

cheezhed

So are the new grades correct or the old ones?

Walkerlover

Is there any reason you didn’t submit them to PCGS instead or do you just prefer NGC?

AlanSki

@Walkerlover said:
Is there any reason you didn’t submit them to PCGS instead or do you just prefer NGC?

My registry started as NGC so to keep it consistent, I stayed with them.