GTG 1945-S WLH

mikee999

Walkerfan

This issue is notorious for it's weakness.

This one, although notably soft, is remarkably clean.

For that reason; I'll say 65.

Connecticoin

65

jfriedm56

Oh, the old upside down certified walker. Can’t really offer an opinion from those pics.

privatecoin

64

erscolo

63 and not an easy date or mintmark.

OAKSTAR

63.

Put it right side up and I'll give you a point.

coinkat

The image is upside down... while the 45-s has issues, that date is not as problematic as the 40-s, 41-s and 44-s

While it might grade 65, I doubt that there will be significant interest at the 65 grade based on expectations.

mikee999

@coinkat said:
The image is upside down... while the 45-s has issues, that date is not as problematic as the 40-s, 41-s and 44-s

While it might grade 65, I doubt that there will be significant interest at the 65 grade based on expectations.

The huge advantages of viewing images on an iPhone vs a PC.

Walkerfan

Every S minted Walker from 1940 through 1945 has strike issues..

johnny9434

I'm in at ms64

1946Hamm

63

mikee999

@1946Hamm said:
63