@davewesen said:
I would want stronger strike to go gem, so MS64 for me
I’ll guess MS64, too. But the date doesn’t typically come well struck and the strike on the subject coin is plenty good enough for a higher grade. Here’s a PCGS 67:
Subject coin:
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
mikee999
Posts: 533 ✭✭✭✭
Comments
MS65
MS 65, although the toning is a distraction. A decent strike for the San Francisco Mint at the time.
66
“I may not believe in myself but I believe in what I’m doing” ~Jimmy Page~
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947)
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I like this one, and the toning does not bother me, I'm at 66 too here!
I'll go 65
MS66; coin looks high end except for a couple negligible marks on the reverse.
I would want stronger strike to go gem, so MS64 for me
Nice looking MS 65
63
Cheers, and God Bless, CRHer700
64
I’ll guess MS64, too. But the date doesn’t typically come well struck and the strike on the subject coin is plenty good enough for a higher grade. Here’s a PCGS 67:
Subject coin:
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I'll go 64+
65
Do the TPGs change their grading standards by date/mintmark or are they consistent throughout the series?
Another possibility is NG-cleaned or machine damage as I have seen those and not detectible on TrueView.
65