Home U.S. Coin Forum

GTG - 1866 w/rays 5C PCGS****Answered****

CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited February 12, 2024 7:32PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Along with the grade, feel free to answer if you think it beaned or not. The latter is optional; I sensed a number of our members object to adding that. But, as usual, the big reveal is tonight. Good luck!


“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian

Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian

Comments

  • erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭✭✭

    On the fence between 64 and 65. How about 64+. Looks pretty original so I think it has a green CAC sticker too.

  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,002 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice clash, I would feel it would merit a 65 if no cleaning/dipping involved.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • 2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 820 ✭✭✭✭✭

    66…and no CAC if that is the grade

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 1,287 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think it looks pretty clean. I noticed the clash also. At first I thought it was a scratch then I noticed the shape.
    With all that said I also say-
    MS66 with a cac sticker.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,697 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 12, 2024 8:20AM

    MS64 but very nice. Muted luster and strike away from gem

  • lkeneficlkenefic Posts: 8,160 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS64 and a green bean was my first impression... cool die clash!!

    Collecting: Dansco 7070; Middle Date Large Cents (VF-AU); Box of 20;

    Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,281 ✭✭✭✭✭

    nice piece, 64+ is my guess, I like your comment about the bean, that bean seems to irritate many, probably for the wrong reasons, but I get it. I'd say beaned here.

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,395 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65 cac

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • lcoopielcoopie Posts: 8,872 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What’s up with the luster?

    LCoopie = Les
  • CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lcoopie: pics are true views & represent the coin fairly, imo.

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian

  • Eldorado9Eldorado9 Posts: 2,287 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS-65, no CAC

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lightly circulated 63

  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 12, 2024 11:21AM

    64+ CAC

    Edited prior to grade reveal.

  • PizzamanPizzaman Posts: 285 ✭✭✭

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Lightly circulated 63

    I'm not processing that. How can you tell it circulated if there's no trace of wear?

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Pizzaman said:

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Lightly circulated 63

    I'm not processing that. How can you tell it circulated if there's no trace of wear?

    Because it’s a more acceptable response [due to the diminished luster] than lightly cleaned?

  • PizzamanPizzaman Posts: 285 ✭✭✭

    @tradedollarnut said:

    @Pizzaman said:

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Lightly circulated 63

    I'm not processing that. How can you tell it circulated if there's no trace of wear?

    Because it’s a more acceptable response [due to the diminished luster] than lightly cleaned?

    You mean you don't know yourself what you mean, you're asking me? Or you're saying it's cleaned? The luster is muted, that doesn't mean anything.

  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭✭✭

    65 cac

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,308 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 12, 2024 3:03PM

    I need another Lincoln cent, I'm way better with those. ;) Way out of my comfort zone but I'm at 64 with no CAC.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Pizzaman said:

    @tradedollarnut said:

    @Pizzaman said:

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Lightly circulated 63

    I'm not processing that. How can you tell it circulated if there's no trace of wear?

    Because it’s a more acceptable response [due to the diminished luster] than lightly cleaned?

    You mean you don't know yourself what you mean, you're asking me? Or you're saying it's cleaned? The luster is muted, that doesn't mean anything.

    Yup. And lightly circulated for a nickel [that won’t show any wear for a long time] is as good a reason as any

  • CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭✭✭


    @Eldorado9 nailed this one as he got both the 65 grade & the sticker (that part was optional today). But also correct with the 65 were @jesbbroken, @privatecoin & @alaura22. Thanks to all for grading & the good comments!

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 3,697 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maybe it didn’t sticker because they thought it was a 64

  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 12, 2024 7:49PM

    When all 65s look like that, gradeflation will be over and they’ll have to go to a 100 pt scale

  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 12, 2024 8:21PM

    Nerver mind

  • PizzamanPizzaman Posts: 285 ✭✭✭

    @tradedollarnut said:

    @Pizzaman said:

    @tradedollarnut said:

    @Pizzaman said:

    @tradedollarnut said:
    Lightly circulated 63

    I'm not processing that. How can you tell it circulated if there's no trace of wear?

    Because it’s a more acceptable response [due to the diminished luster] than lightly cleaned?

    You mean you don't know yourself what you mean, you're asking me? Or you're saying it's cleaned? The luster is muted, that doesn't mean anything.

    Yup. And lightly circulated for a nickel [that won’t show any wear for a long time] is as good a reason as any

    You know, actually, that's a very interesting theory. And I'm not trying to be smart, saying that. Can circulation abate luster prior to showing any wear? If that's what you meant by lightly circulated MS63, I missed your point. But, yes, I think you're right, Sherlock, it can. :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file