2000 D Sac Dollar
2fun2Bbad
Posts: 110 ✭✭
I hope the pictures are good enough to see if it's DDO or MD, split serriffs, right?
0
2fun2Bbad
Posts: 110 ✭✭
Comments
Looks split to me, but is it a listed variety by Wexler?
bob
vegas, baby!
Not yet, but want advice before I do anything
I had heard John was having health problems. I thought a read somewhere that he was no longer doing attributions. Not sure if someone else took over his website.
https://doubleddie.com/1801.html
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
@2fun2Bbad - You might also try CONECA Attribution.
Generally speaking, I believe the TPG'ers need to see documentation from these attributers or see it listed in the Cherrypickers guide before they will slab it. However, you can contact them with pictures and ask.
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
Thank you so much for your help, maybe it will work out well for everyone.
I looked on Wexlers and it's true they aren't doing attributions, I am praying for John.
There is a note midway down on your linked page from John Wexler as of February 5, 2023 that he is retired and explains the health reasons and that the site will continue.
As far as the original posters coin, it would still need some sharper photos. Those look almost like an image of a screen. It does seem to have some potential. Need more experts to weigh in.
"To Be Esteemed Be Useful" - 1792 Birch Cent --- "I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Although these pics at least show something, I'm still in the "probably not" camp.
WinLoseWin might have put a finger on the problem. If this are photos of a monitor, that would explain a lot in terms of the quality. We need CLEAR pictures. A photo of a screen of a photo won't cut it, sorry. Search Google for instructions on how to take screenshots, if that's the issue.
The R and I splits look pretty nice. I agree about the possible coneca submission. Good luck. Peace Roy
BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW
Thank you everyone
They are pixelated photos of a screen and thus useless.
ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
They are pixelated photos of a screen and thus useless
The question is there enough evidence to look at the coin in hand to see if it is a new variety or not, right?
Thank you for your time.