1962 Franklin Proof is it Cameo or DCam
![Morgan13](https://us.v-cdn.net/6027503/uploads/userpics/SIYCX1WETVRA/nRD1AZ55XCYEH.jpg)
I don't know the difference. I have had this coin for decades now. I haven't really paid much attention to it. Today I decided to find out if it has any value.
Can you please tell me if it's Cameo or Deep Cameo from these images?
It has the same box it came with many moons ago.
I cracked the seal to take some images. It was sealed all these years.
I'd just as soon sell or trade it to add to my Morgan collection if it's worth anything.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7
1
Comments
Cam based strictly on the pics
Hopefully cam from those pics. If the frost is as weak as it looks on the right side of the bell and lower part of Ben’s face, then maybe not.
Light source was coming from the left side hanging light. The frost is pretty even across all the devices.
Do these have a mint mark somewhere?
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7
Based upon my recent grade results on proof Franklins I would say your coin would not receive a Cameo or a DCAM designation.
>
These proofs were minted in Philadelphia. Philly didn’t use a mint mark then.
- Bob -
![image](https://robecsimages.com/photos/MPL/MPLcollageNGCwhite.jpg)
MPL's - Lincolns of Color
Central Valley Roosevelts
Looks like it was probably NGC graded in the capitol plastic holder and somebody peeled of the seals. Looks CAM from the pics.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
I do not think it would CAM, nice proof.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
In 66 CAM its about a $50 coin. In 67 CAM its about $80 so I dont think itcwould be worth the cost of certification.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
The first set of photos seem more realistic, while the second look to have exaggerated frost due to the lighting (a very common issue that can be hard to tamp down). As such, I don't think the coin quite gets to cameo.
I agree... The bib is way to bright . Thats the problem area that PCGS and NGC will hit every time.
It was not graded by NGC I know that for sure. I purchased it with the seals on it. Its in a capital holder. Some dealers were and still are like that. You cut the seals you own it. No returns. But I'd say after 25-30 years I've lost my possible refund.
I appreciate the information and I fully accept that it won't likely cameo. I may still send it in on an economy submission I am planning for this winter.
Thank you guys for looking.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7
Here is a 1962 proof half dollar that was graded a few days ago. It graded PF68 and did not receive a Cameo designation.
Here is a another 1962 proof half dollar that was graded a few days ago. It graded PF68CAM.
Compare your half dollar to the two half dollars mentioned above.