Seated Dollar GTG Part 2: The Very First Mint-Marked Silver Dollar> 1846-O **REVEAL**
BadaBling
Posts: 104 ✭✭✭
Picked this one up raw several years back at one of the PNNA shows…
*AU55
Tagged:
2
Comments
AU Details. Looks whizzed at least in the photos.
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
It may have been wiped long ago, but I'm guessing it straight graded AU-55
I think it's straight-graded as an AU55.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
It is a little devoid of tone (dipped), but still pretty nice.
I'll guess AU53.
Details
straight 55. High-def iPhone pics will highlight hairlines and make them looks worse than in hand.
BHNC #248 … 130 and counting.
53
RIP Mom- 1932-2012
58
Don't like the lack of originality, might straight grade.
I say details AU
55
Mr_Spud
A bright 58.
Collector of Capped Bust Halves, SLQ's, Commems, and random cool stuff! @davidv_numismatics on Instagram
55
Unc details cleaned
Looks like some hairlines. Could be anywhere from details or AU-50 to 55.
"To Be Esteemed Be Useful" - 1792 Birch Cent --- "I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain." - Lily Tomlin
Should be graded AU Details but PCGS probably graded it AU-55.
It will not CAC because the surfaces are not original.
My guess is 58.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
58.
I think AU55; certainly dipped, maybe had a light cleaning at some point.
It’s definitely a 58, but I’ve seen worse in 61 holders
55
Ms62
It's all about what the people want...
55
Yeah I’ve noticed that.
55
Dipped at some point, but I'm thinking a straight-graded 55 too...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
AU55
AU55 based upon visible luster on the coin. AU58 based upon high point wear. Dipped, wiped.
AU details, cleaned or dipped but probably in a straight graded holder.
Straight AU55…. When I submitted it, I fully expected to get it back in a Details holder. 🤷🏻♂️
I would’ve said 58
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I agree with the grade range of au55-au58, but its not my type because of the color or lack thereof.
"Straight AU55…. When I submitted it, I fully expected to get it back in a Details holder." 🤷🏻♂️
"Should be graded AU Details but PCGS probably graded it AU-55."
We certainly agreed on this one.
Nice coin, properly graded.
Very interesting to see it in a non-details holder. Congrats on getting into that holder.
Successful BST with BustDMs , Pnies20, lkeigwin, pursuitofliberty, Bullsitter, felinfoel, SPalladino (CBH's - 37 Die Marriage's)
$5 Type Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/u-s-coins/type-sets/half-eagle-type-set-circulation-strikes-1795-1929/album/344192
CBH Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/everyman-collections/everyman-half-dollars/everyman-capped-bust-half-dollars-1807-1839/album/345572