Home U.S. Coin Forum

*grades revealed both ms61* GTG 1911d $2.5 gold Indian

PppPpp Posts: 511 ✭✭✭✭
edited November 4, 2023 6:31PM in U.S. Coin Forum

Below are pictures of two graded 1911d strong d $2.5 gold Indians.

Based on these pictures what would you grade each coin.

I plan to post the grades in a day or two.

Ngc obverse:

Ngc reverse:

PCGS obverse:

PCGS reverse:

—————— revised photos below————

I took pictures again without digital zoom. I guess my good idea wasn’t that good.

Here are new pictures I hope they are better. I also included them in the original post.

I really appreciate and look forward to comments.
Thank you

Revised Ngc photos:

Revised PCGS photos:

Comments

  • Manifest_DestinyManifest_Destiny Posts: 6,900 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm not good at grading these. Nice coins though, especially the PCGS. NGC looks cleaned maybe, based on the pics. I'll guess 58 on the PCGS.

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,556 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Might be the pictures but it seems more shiny than it should be. I'm going AU details polished

    Collector, occasional seller

  • rsei0120rsei0120 Posts: 127 ✭✭

    I am guessing and MS63, sorry I am still learning

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,594 ✭✭✭✭✭

    NGC AU polished. PCGS 58.

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,358 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The pics are very poor so it's hard to tell. They look AU and cleaned.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,492 ✭✭✭✭✭

    NGC 58
    Pcgs 55

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,516 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The harsh lighting makes it impossible to really get any decent feel for the surfaces, total WAG, NGC AU58, PCGS MS61.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • Project NumismaticsProject Numismatics Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very poor pictures. Pictures read AU details cleaned, but I’d never make a decision based off these photos.

  • Mr_SpudMr_Spud Posts: 5,834 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I more often than not get these incuse designs wrong, but they both look like 63s to me.

    Mr_Spud

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 8,631 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU53 if straight grade, and MS62.

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 4,042 ✭✭✭✭✭

    These are hard enough to grade as it is, need better pics. Don’t use digital zoom.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • PppPpp Posts: 511 ✭✭✭✭

    I took pictures again without digital zoom. I guess my good idea wasn’t that good.

    Here are new pictures I hope they are better. I also included them in the original post.

    I really appreciate and look forward to comments.
    Thank you

    Revised Ngc photos:

    Revised PCGS photos:

  • maymay Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 3, 2023 12:17PM

    The NGC one is definitely circulated, so probably a 55-58, but their grades can be all over the place. The PCGS one is slightly circulated IMO, so I’m guessing 62.

    Type collector, mainly into Seated. -formerly Ownerofawheatiehorde. Good BST transactions with: mirabela, OKCC, MICHAELDIXON, Gerard

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,556 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I don't remember two coins...
    With the new pics I'll go 58 on both. Nice examples

    Collector, occasional seller

  • PppPpp Posts: 511 ✭✭✭✭

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,556 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice

    Collector, occasional seller

  • crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 13,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice. Congratulations👍

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file