Deleted. Posted In Error
Walkerlover
Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭
.
0
Walkerlover
Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭
Walkerlover
Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭
Comments
My head hurts...
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
No.
"Got a flaming heart, can't get my fill"
Could you repeat the question?
You confused people by introducing the legacy designation into the question, which is more or less irrelevant. Legacy coins will cross with a + if they think the coin merits one. You also confused people by using the “CACG + L” as opposed to cacg/L
OP’s question rephrased
Should a CACG 64+ be worth more than a CACG 64?
my answer: Yes, theoretically just like pcgs 64+ normally sells for more than a 64
Founder- Peak Rarities
Website
Instagram
Facebook
Your question makes no sense as it was phrased.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
Magic 8 ball says....
Concentrate and ask again.
Coin Photographer.
No, why do some people insist on trying to make conclusions regarding grades assigned by CACG.
Each coin should be evaluated on its merits regardless of a plus or Legacy designation.
The only value that I can discern from the L designation is knowing that you have 2 TPGs agreeing on the grade, not just CAC. Theoretically, non-L should be worth slightly less.
http://ProofCollection.Net
What do the coins look like?
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
A PCGS+ or NGC+ may or may not become a CACG+
And a PCGS or NGC no + could become a CACG+
- Bob -
MPL's - Lincolns of Color
Central Valley Roosevelts
Man I hate it when an OP completely deletes their post. It's like trying to decipher a code.
Philippians 4:4-7
insufficient postage?
@Walkerlover was simply attempting to reconcile the time-dependent Schrodinger Equation for one spatial dimension. Here you go, @Walkerlover, this should give you a good head start-
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
Thanks Tom. I had to get rid of this thread as it doesn’t make sense, my mistake
Someone (messydesk) used the quote feature and preserved the opening post.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Great post. I am teaching partial derivatives today along with second partials as shown in the formula.
Successful BST with drddm, BustDMs, Pnies20, lkeigwin, pursuitofliberty, Bullsitter, felinfoel, SPalladino
$5 Type Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/u-s-coins/type-sets/half-eagle-type-set-circulation-strikes-1795-1929/album/344192
CBH Set https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/everyman-collections/everyman-half-dollars/everyman-capped-bust-half-dollars-1807-1839/album/345572
Thanks, I missed that but now I understand. As someone else said my head hurts.
Philippians 4:4-7
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
Google cached the original question: "It has occurred to me that considering CACG grading appears to be fairly tight that CACG plus + infers a very high end coin for the grade meriting the plus for sure. On the other hand CACG + L Legacy only means CACG considers the coin solid for the grade.not necessarily + plus. So should the buyer prefer the Non Legacy coin and value it higher, having more confidence? Do you agree?"
ANA 50 year/Life Member (now "Emeritus")
This has more
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution