Lamination Error?
VDEAN1220
Posts: 4 ✭
Hello All, When I first saw this 1966 Philadelphia Dime, I thought that it was just dirt until I placed it under my coin microscope. The dime looks to be a lamination error, what do you guys think? Just wanted another set of eyes on it before I submit it for grading.
Tagged:
0
Comments
1) save your money
2) where do you see something that resembles a lamination?
BHNC #203
Take a look at the pealing of the Nickel that shows the copper. Not a crack like most lamination errors, but an obvious error with the striking of this coin. Right?
Not worth the money for grading even if there were a lamination error.
Are you thinking the line running down through the skull and into the ear and beyond is that?
I’m more inclined to think it’s a scratch with dirt in it.
Welcome to the forum by the way!
Happy, humble, honored and proud recipient of the “You Suck” award 10/22/2014
Welcome to the forum!
Not a lamination and not worth sending anywhere.
It looks more like a metal detector find.
The peeling of any part of the surface of a coin is known as a lamination error. Right?
No, not lamination. Even if it was it would only be worth face value.
Type collector, mainly into Seated. -formerly Ownerofawheatiehorde. Good BST transactions with: mirabela, OKCC, MICHAELDIXON, Gerard
Nothing is 'peeling' off the surface of the
environmentally damaged surfaces of the time.
It's a damaged, corroded coin - worth face value only.
Please do not spend any money submitting it to any
authentication service - you'll regret it.
On threads like these, would it be helpful for me to post what a real error type looks like?
Lamination Error Coin ...
I think he's talking about this.
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
I see a corroded coin that was heavily cleaned.
and scratched.
look up the definition of lamination
BHNC #203
its only worth a dime, dont waste your money. welcome to the forums as well