Home U.S. Coin Forum

Anyone else send a submission to CACG today?

ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

Just dropped my first submission to CACG at the post office today. Any one else get a package off today?

«13

Comments

  • 1madman1madman Posts: 1,508 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Aren’t they still blocking everyone from submitting except investors in the company?

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 3,993 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:
    Aren’t they still blocking everyone from submitting except investors in the company?

    No, that period ends today, and they are open for submissions to all members.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • MetroDMetroD Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Manorcourtman said:
    Initially when the whole thing started I was going to send them some business. But the hype has worn off and I will continue to send my business to PCGS.

    I will use all 3 top tier services when appropriate for me. This is my first to CACG.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have finalized my selections and will have my first CACG submission in the mail tomorrow! Should be interesting. :)

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinbuf said:
    I have finalized my selections and will have my first CACG submission in the mail tomorrow! Should be interesting. :)

    Good luck. I am really interested to see how they grade. Most of the 16 coins I submitted for cross have a minimum grade higher than that already on the holder. Mostly old holders I do not want to loose unless the upgrade. I hope I don't get spanked!

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ironmanl63 said:

    @coinbuf said:
    I have finalized my selections and will have my first CACG submission in the mail tomorrow! Should be interesting. :)

    Good luck. I am really interested to see how they grade. Most of the 16 coins I submitted for cross have a minimum grade higher than that already on the holder. Mostly old holders I do not want to loose unless the upgrade. I hope I don't get spanked!

    Good luck with your submission as well, all my coins are raw, it could be quite the learning curve. :)

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2, 2023 3:21PM

    Here’s an example of how CACG handled a cross over for those that are interested

    PCGS MS65 & CAC sticker

    To CACG 65+

  • marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ironmanl63 said:

    @coinbuf said:
    I have finalized my selections and will have my first CACG submission in the mail tomorrow! Should be interesting. :)

    Good luck. I am really interested to see how they grade. Most of the 16 coins I submitted for cross have a minimum grade higher than that already on the holder. Mostly old holders I do not want to loose unless the upgrade. I hope I don't get spanked!

    I'm sure you'll post the results, this will be informative to watch how it evolves, good luck.

  • robecrobec Posts: 6,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I sent in a small submission of 6 coins this morning.

  • goldengolden Posts: 9,766 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Not me.

  • marmacmarmac Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭

    I look forward to assembling a few submissions later this week. Gerry Fortin’s submission noted above certainly illustrates some coins that at least in part could likely see a straight grade elsewhere but apparently not at CACG. It will be interesting to see how this all unfolds among all stakeholders in the hobby.

  • JimWJimW Posts: 564 ✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for the reference to Gerry's blog - I have had it bookmarked and is not new to me. I would encourage others to check it out - particularly to get a full understanding of the comments. I did not view it as Gerry suggesting he got 'terrible results' or got 'hammered'; moreover, an interesting commentary on how CACG grading will affect the TPG market in general. Your point about being selective on submissions is well taken :)

    Successful BST Transactions: erwindoc, VTchaser, moursund, robkool, RelicKING, Herb_T, Meltdown, ElmerFusterpuck, airplanenut

  • WalkerloverWalkerlover Posts: 934 ✭✭✭✭

    @RLSnapper said:
    Be prepared for the worst if you are submitting raw or non CAC coins to CACG. Read Gerry Fortin's blog to see the terrible results he had and his spin on the results. A respected expert in seated coins got hammered by JA and his crew. It only makes sense to submit legacy NGC coins to CACG IMO.

    can you please forward the link to Fortins Blog to us?

  • winestevenwinesteven Posts: 4,606 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Scroll down to Friday September 29th:

    http://www.seateddimevarieties.com/DailyBlog.htm

    Steve

    A day without fine wine and working on your coin collection is like a day without sunshine!!!

    My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
    https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
  • DisneyFanDisneyFan Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm noticing those tabs holding the dimes really stand out.

    @RLSnapper said:

  • Coin FinderCoin Finder Posts: 7,227 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Well good question. I was averaging about 60 percent sticker rate on my submissions. The last batch I sent, out of 8 coins only one stickered!! Ouch.. And I had to pay this time, double ouch. So I'm waiting.... In the meantime my PCGS membership auto renewed so I need to use those up first.. My stickered coins I might send in for reholdering but I need to see how the market reacts to these new holders, I need more data I guess...

  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RLSnapper said:
    Be prepared for the worst if you are submitting raw or non CAC coins to CACG. Read Gerry Fortin's blog to see the terrible results he had and his spin on the results. A respected expert in seated coins got hammered by JA and his crew. It only makes sense to submit legacy NGC coins to CACG IMO.

    The coins seem to match the grades given?

  • DisneyFanDisneyFan Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnny010 said:

    @RLSnapper said:
    Be prepared for the worst if you are submitting raw or non CAC coins to CACG. Read Gerry Fortin's blog to see the terrible results he had and his spin on the results. A respected expert in seated coins got hammered by JA and his crew. It only makes sense to submit legacy NGC coins to CACG IMO.

    The coins seem to match the grades given?

    The Cleaned 1860 & 1877 seem pretty obvious. The Cleaned 1876-CC and 1876-S would be harder to catch.

  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DisneyFan said:

    @johnny010 said:

    @RLSnapper said:
    Be prepared for the worst if you are submitting raw or non CAC coins to CACG. Read Gerry Fortin's blog to see the terrible results he had and his spin on the results. A respected expert in seated coins got hammered by JA and his crew. It only makes sense to submit legacy NGC coins to CACG IMO.

    The coins seem to match the grades given?

    The Cleaned 1860 & 1877 seem pretty obvious. The Cleaned 1876-CC and 1876-S would be harder to catch.

    From the pictures here, yes I agree.

  • Project NumismaticsProject Numismatics Posts: 1,579 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If only CACG would let us poor plebes into the club. been on the CAC “wait list” for more than a year.

    I understand they want to reward early supporters and get their operations to a place where they can process the volume, but it’s overly frustrating.

  • RLSnapperRLSnapper Posts: 577 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @johnny010 @DisneyFan I don't know if you read the blog but these were not run of the mill coins. From the blog. "Thursday brought Doug the Mailman to our door step with a return shipment from CAC Grading. Within the 20 pieces economy level submission were 9 Liberty Seated dimes from the reference collection. Nearly all are web-book plate coins."

    "When studying the three Seated dimes that did straight grade, as a whole, versus the balance of the Details graded pieces, it became immediately apparent is to what the CACG expectations are. This one submission has already changed the way I will be looking at coins during dealer trading at major shows. For the average collector, that educational experience will take considerable time as CACG holdered coins filter into the market place. Some collectors will remain comfortable with current PCGS and NGC standards and will no desire to become involved with CACG in the near term. There will be anguish and denials among many collectors as their prior calibrations for originality are up ended."

    Gerry is a backer of JA and CACG....has years of expertise in a niche area and virtually admits to being blind sided by the grades he received. For the average Joe it's hard enough to figure out PCGS grades....I will leave CACG to the experts like Gerry.

    I find it a bit ironic that on CACG Details coins the holder still has the green bean of solid for the grade. Maybe JA should leave off the green bean for Details coins.

  • winestevenwinesteven Posts: 4,606 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just a tiny clarification. I don't think Gerry was blindsided by the "Grades", but was blindsided by the "Details" categorization.

    Steve

    A day without fine wine and working on your coin collection is like a day without sunshine!!!

    My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
    https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
  • johnny010johnny010 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good points
    I think CACG has been transparent they will grade as they see fit and there’s a standard they are going to set. If following the norm was expected by anyone I think the stage is now set.

  • skier07skier07 Posts: 4,045 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m not sure what a web-book plate coin is. Were the coins raw or were they submitted in a slab as a cross at any grade either details or non details?

    CACG is seemingly going to be very conservative but twenty coins is not a big enough sample size to draw any conclusions.

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Order logged in as received today. The wait begins.

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Does anyone here have any experience with turnaround times? I know they just opened to collectors but dealers have been submitting for a few months already.

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 3,993 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ironmanl63 said:
    Does anyone here have any experience with turnaround times? I know they just opened to collectors but dealers have been submitting for a few months already.

    The “soft launch” where the investors submitted took extremely long (3 months?), but they were working out the kinks and having issues with getting the inserts. I would hope that they waited until they could process submissions with reasonable efficiency before they opened to members, but this will be the first real test.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DeplorableDan said:

    @ironmanl63 said:
    Does anyone here have any experience with turnaround times? I know they just opened to collectors but dealers have been submitting for a few months already.

    The “soft launch” where the investors submitted took extremely long (3 months?), but they were working out the kinks and having issues with getting the inserts. I would hope that they waited until they could process submissions with reasonable efficiency before they opened to members, but this will be the first real test.

    Thanks for the info. I think it will be fun to see how this order goes. Pretty exiting to have one of the first submissions for collectors. I will keep sharing as the order progresses so anyone who wants can follow along with me!

  • winestevenwinesteven Posts: 4,606 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DeplorableDan said:

    @ironmanl63 said:
    Does anyone here have any experience with turnaround times? I know they just opened to collectors but dealers have been submitting for a few months already.

    The “soft launch” where the investors submitted took extremely long (3 months?), but they were working out the kinks and having issues with getting the inserts. I would hope that they waited until they could process submissions with reasonable efficiency before they opened to members, but this will be the first real test.

    As Dan says, the lack of several of the plastic collars/inserts was the holdup. I heard that if one had an order in for 10 coins, and collars were available for 9 of the 10, the order would not get completed with grades released and coins shipped until all coins in the order were completed.

    Steve

    A day without fine wine and working on your coin collection is like a day without sunshine!!!

    My collecting “Pride & Joy” is my PCGS Registry Dansco 7070 Set:
    https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/type-sets/design-type-sets/complete-dansco-7070-modified-type-set-1796-date/publishedset/213996
  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Status was updated to grading today. Pretty shocked it moved so quick. Will let you know when it changes again.

  • robecrobec Posts: 6,772 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ironmanl63 said:
    Status was updated to grading today. Pretty shocked it moved so quick. Will let you know when it changes again.

    That is pretty fast. Mine was logged in today, hopefully it will also progress to grading after one day. I’ve had a submission sitting in Received at PCGS. for a week now.

  • 1madman1madman Posts: 1,508 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @winesteven said:
    All of these coins were straight graded. I believe the vast majority had been graded by PCGS, but some by NGC. Submitted to cross at any grade, hence the six new Details CACG slabs

    I’m getting the feeling the real winners coming from cacg are going to be pcgs & ngc. I would think this pile of details coins is now going to end up being cracked and REsubmitted to pcgs/ngc to try and get their straight grades once again so they have an attempt at some value and salability. Pcgs/ngc gets the first bite of the apple, and now they’re getting the last bite as well.

    In that other thread a person asked if cacg was taking away business from pcgs resulting in quicker current turnaround times. Looking at a submission like this, I would argue pcgs turnaround times should increase in the near future.

    It appears the way to submit to cacg is crossover for straightgraded coins to save added expenses down the road. Does anyone know if they charge a cross fee (like the 1% premium pcgs does)?

  • JimTylerJimTyler Posts: 3,463 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @RLSnapper said:
    Be prepared for the worst if you are submitting raw or non CAC coins to CACG. Read Gerry Fortin's blog to see the terrible results he had and his spin on the results. A respected expert in seated coins got hammered by JA and his crew. It only makes sense to submit legacy NGC coins to CACG IMO.

    .
    .
    I’m waiting for the stories of CACG detail coins cracked out and resubmitted into a straight grade CACG holder.

  • MetroDMetroD Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:

    @winesteven said:
    All of these coins were straight graded. I believe the vast majority had been graded by PCGS, but some by NGC. Submitted to cross at any grade, hence the six new Details CACG slabs

    I’m getting the feeling the real winners coming from cacg are going to be pcgs & ngc. I would think this pile of details coins is now going to end up being cracked and REsubmitted to pcgs/ngc to try and get their straight grades once again so they have an attempt at some value and salability. Pcgs/ngc gets the first bite of the apple, and now they’re getting the last bite as well.

    In that other thread a person asked if cacg was taking away business from pcgs resulting in quicker current turnaround times. Looking at a submission like this, I would argue pcgs turnaround times should increase in the near future.

    It appears the way to submit to cacg is crossover for straightgraded coins to save added expenses down the road. Does anyone know if they charge a cross fee (like the 1% premium pcgs does)?

    Nothing about a GP in the "submission pricing" for "crossover".


    Source: https://www.cacgrading.com/pricing

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 3,993 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:

    @winesteven said:
    All of these coins were straight graded. I believe the vast majority had been graded by PCGS, but some by NGC. Submitted to cross at any grade, hence the six new Details CACG slabs

    I’m getting the feeling the real winners coming from cacg are going to be pcgs & ngc. I would think this pile of details coins is now going to end up being cracked and REsubmitted to pcgs/ngc to try and get their straight grades once again so they have an attempt at some value and salability. Pcgs/ngc gets the first bite of the apple, and now they’re getting the last bite as well.

    In that other thread a person asked if cacg was taking away business from pcgs resulting in quicker current turnaround times. Looking at a submission like this, I would argue pcgs turnaround times should increase in the near future.

    It appears the way to submit to cacg is crossover for straightgraded coins to save added expenses down the road. Does anyone know if they charge a cross fee (like the 1% premium pcgs does)?

    No, they do not. Also, I agree that many will probably play arbitrage with the CACG details coins.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My order shows to be in postgrading. No results are shown but looks like the coins have already been graded. Unbelievably fast movement so far.

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ironmanl63 said:
    My order shows to be in postgrading. No results are shown but looks like the coins have already been graded. Unbelievably fast movement so far.

    That is great news. :)

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • MICHAELDIXONMICHAELDIXON Posts: 6,527 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No, I haven't decided to send to CACG. I'm still a "Kool Aid" drinker here! LOL!

    Spring National Battlefield Coin Show is April 3-5, 2025 at the Eisenhower Hotel Ballroom, Gettysburg, PA. WWW.AmericasCoinShows.com
  • robecrobec Posts: 6,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 10, 2023 5:41PM

    @ironmanl63 said:
    My order shows to be in postgrading. No results are shown but looks like the coins have already been graded. Unbelievably fast movement so far.

    My order was a day behind you when your went from received to Grading. Mine did go to grading the following day. It will be interesting to see if it goes to postgrading tomorrow.
    That’s a span of 5 days……..lightning fast.

    Edited: just checked, postgrading here also.

  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ironmanl63 said:
    My order shows to be in postgrading. No results are shown but looks like the coins have already been graded. Unbelievably fast movement so far.

    I hope you have better results then Gerry did
    Good luck

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @alaura22 said:

    @ironmanl63 said:
    My order shows to be in postgrading. No results are shown but looks like the coins have already been graded. Unbelievably fast movement so far.

    I hope you have better results then Gerry did
    Good luck

    Earlier in the thread ironman wrote that all (or most) of his submission is crossovers with minimum grades specified, so while we don't know his results, I'm pretty sure that he will not face the issues that Gerry encountered.

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinbuf said:

    @ironmanl63 said:

    @coinbuf said:
    I have finalized my selections and will have my first CACG submission in the mail tomorrow! Should be interesting. :)

    Good luck. I am really interested to see how they grade. Most of the 16 coins I submitted for cross have a minimum grade higher than that already on the holder. Mostly old holders I do not want to loose unless the upgrade. I hope I don't get spanked!

    Good luck with your submission as well, all my coins are raw, it could be quite the learning curve. :)

    My bad
    It was you I was wishing luck to...............

  • ironmanl63ironmanl63 Posts: 1,973 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @alaura22 said:

    @coinbuf said:

    @ironmanl63 said:

    @coinbuf said:
    I have finalized my selections and will have my first CACG submission in the mail tomorrow! Should be interesting. :)

    Good luck. I am really interested to see how they grade. Most of the 16 coins I submitted for cross have a minimum grade higher than that already on the holder. Mostly old holders I do not want to loose unless the upgrade. I hope I don't get spanked!

    Good luck with your submission as well, all my coins are raw, it could be quite the learning curve. :)

    My bad
    It was you I was wishing luck to...............

    I could use the well wishes! I am going to assume you were wishing me luck as well. LOL

  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,486 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @alaura22 said:

    @coinbuf said:

    @ironmanl63 said:

    @coinbuf said:
    I have finalized my selections and will have my first CACG submission in the mail tomorrow! Should be interesting. :)

    Good luck. I am really interested to see how they grade. Most of the 16 coins I submitted for cross have a minimum grade higher than that already on the holder. Mostly old holders I do not want to loose unless the upgrade. I hope I don't get spanked!

    Good luck with your submission as well, all my coins are raw, it could be quite the learning curve. :)

    My bad
    It was you I was wishing luck to...............

    Thanks, I have no doubt that I will need all the luck I can get. ;)

    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • alaura22alaura22 Posts: 3,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Of course
    Best of luck to both of you
    Looking forward to the results

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file