Options
AT or NT? Seven lucky coins inside....
EarlyUS
Posts: 306 ✭✭✭
Sorry for the quick iPhone pics. I've had these stashed away for at least ten years.
2
Comments
They've naturally toned in an artificial environment. Hope that helps.
They look ok to me, I believe they would straight grade if you submitted them to PCGS.
Mr_Spud
I don’t know what the proper designation should be but they all look market acceptable.
Look natural to me based on the pictures and the containers. Would be cool to get one of them slabbed with the cardboard intact.
If you slab it with the cardboard, it's going to continue to change.
You can tone any coin with that cheap cardboard.
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Nice subtle toning - NT. The cardboard holders most likeley contain sulfur compunds.
"When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"
That’s a nice, attractive NT look.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I am in the market acceptable/NT group. However, I cannot help but wonder if all were submitted together, would that very similar toning on all the coins rase a red flag.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
NT all day long.
Dave
I vote NT also.