@Snowwoman23 said:
Yea the cut was a shame but a nice coin otherwise
I'm not sure what the reason was for posting the coin. But it's a common date that would probably receive a details grade, due to the cut and grade only (approximately) MS62, even without it.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
@Snowwoman23 said:
Yea the cut was a shame but a nice coin otherwise
I'm not sure what the reason was for posting the coin. But it's a common date that would probably receive a details grade, due to the cut and grade only (approximately) MS62, even without it.
Reason ..... Enthusiasm. We should encourage coin collectors.
@Snowwoman23 said:
Yea the cut was a shame but a nice coin otherwise
I'm not sure what the reason was for posting the coin. But it's a common date that would probably receive a details grade, due to the cut and grade only (approximately) MS62, even without it.
Reason ..... Enthusiasm. We should encourage coin collectors.
Maybe that was the reason, but unless we're told, we don't know. And fairly often, it's not what we would have guessed.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
@Snowwoman23 said:
Yea the cut was a shame but a nice coin otherwise
I'm not sure what the reason was for posting the coin. But it's a common date that would probably receive a details grade, due to the cut and grade only (approximately) MS62, even without it.
Reason ..... Enthusiasm. We should encourage coin collectors.
Maybe that was the reason, but unless we're told, we don't know. And fairly often, it's not what we would have guessed.
Since it's a new person that isn't taking microscope pics of corroded pocket change, I don't mind at all.
Comments
Looks like VAM 11 (strong repunched date), but with a nasty cut in the coin on the upper reverse.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
Yea the cut was a shame but a nice coin otherwise
I'm not sure what the reason was for posting the coin. But it's a common date that would probably receive a details grade, due to the cut and grade only (approximately) MS62, even without it.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Reason ..... Enthusiasm. We should encourage coin collectors.
Maybe that was the reason, but unless we're told, we don't know. And fairly often, it's not what we would have guessed.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Since it's a new person that isn't taking microscope pics of corroded pocket change, I don't mind at all.
Thanks for sharing. Nice repunched date.
Nice low MS Morgan. Too bad about the cut,
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/