Is this 78 CC overgraded?

Options
goldrealmoney79
goldrealmoney79 Posts: 417 ✭✭✭
in U.S. Coin Forum

Sitting in a 63 holder, but in my eyes seems to have quite a bit of chatter for a 63. Where do you think our host would grade it at?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/256212694639?

Comments

  • Keshequa
    Keshequa Posts: 110 ✭✭✭
    Options

    @lermish said:
    I think that they would grade it at their headquarters in Santa Ana, CA

    Reading comprehension is one’s friend.
    Well done.

    Buying and Selling coins for 54 years, 700+ shows in last 20 years, and boy am I tired.
    Purchased and Trademarked the Mohawk Valley Hoard
    Originated the Rochester (NY) Area Coin Expo

  • Project Numismatics
    Project Numismatics Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    A bit of an etiquette breach to disparage a seller’s coin that is actively being offered for sale.

    There are exceptions for listings that violate hobby ethics (inaccurately described, counterfeit, juiced pictures, bad sales practices, etc.), but I don’t see that to be the case here.

  • burfle23
    burfle23 Posts: 2,674 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 10, 2023 2:46PM
    Options

    Hate to comment on less than perfect pics as listed. I went into the hosts images for a 63 and just picked one; glad I don't collect or grade Morgans (genuine ones anyway)!

    https://www.pcgs.com/cert/45756195

  • AUandAG
    AUandAG Posts: 25,050 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Next time just copy and paste the pics without the link to the seller's listing.
    Oh, yes, I'd say it's a tad over graded. I see it at a 62 and no more.
    bob :)
    vegas baby!

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • jerseyben
    jerseyben Posts: 123 ✭✭✭
    edited September 11, 2023 7:37AM
    Options

    Edit: I was commenting on the wrong coin. No opinion.

  • sellitstore
    sellitstore Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Hard to be exact due to picture quality. Luster looks to be really strong and nice so they may have bumped it up a grade. But, yeah, plenty of (maybe too many) bagmarks for a 63.

    Collector and dealer in obsolete currency. Always buying all obsolete bank notes and scrip.
  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,149 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Why single out that particular listing?
    The pictures aren’t very good ones for making a grading assessment. And even if they were and the coin was over-graded, there are countless other examples that are much worse.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • HillbillyCollector
    HillbillyCollector Posts: 736 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Pictures make it a bit hard to tell. If I were guessing, I would say 62 but on a good day they may let it slide as a 63. The POPs actually show more in 63 than 62 so a least that’s a good sign that they may be a tad more liberal with the date.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Comment As ...

Categories